Denied boarding because I didn’t pay a change fee

Always read to the end. The very end.

That’s my takeaway from today’s failed case, which involves a woman who was denied boarding on a United Airlines flight because she hadn’t paid a mysterious fee.

Kelsey Doorey was flying from Los Angeles to Ancona, Italy, with stops in Newark and Munich, in May. She made it to Newark without incident. But when she tried to board her flight to Germany, she ran into trouble.

She explains,

The agent at gate 74 told me that United had changed my reservation to a later flight in anticipation of me missing my tight connection.

I was told to speak with customer service across the hall change my reservation back to my original flight.

The customer service agent I spoke with was rude and unhelpful. She told me that I was not going to make my flight, despite the gate agent holding the gate open.

She then informed me that I owed $552, but failed to provide any explanation why. I offered my credit card and paid but it was too late for my original flight so she then booked me on a later flight.

I was flying to Italy for a four-day weekend family obligation and the new flight I was put on resulted in me losing an entire day in Italy. Instead of arriving at 11:20 a.m., I arrived after 5:30 p.m.

That’s as far as I read before I sent a note to my United Airlines contact, asking if he could look into this case. I should have kept reading. (Sorry, United.)

Let me skip to the end: The $552 charge was correct. The agents did the right thing, although they could have been a little nicer about it.

But at that moment, after I got done reading the last line of Doorey’s letter, I thought United had screwed up big-time. Maybe it had something to do with the disastrous cutover. Or maybe it was just overall incompetence, I thought. I was wrong.

The response from United was right to the point:

Our records indicate that you were charged a $250 change fee and a $286.66 fee for the difference in the fare.

This was due to the changes made to your ticket on February 25th. Because these fees were not collected during the change, you were denied boarding until the fees were paid.

Huh? I reviewed the entire document.

Here’s a little detail in the note that I had glossed over: Back in February she had changed her flights. And for some reason — it’s not entirely clear why — United never collected the change fee and fare differential.

To be fair, that fact was buried near the bottom of the document she sent me.

Had I continued reading, I would have seen a more detailed account about how United mishandled her ticket at Newark. The agents were not that nice. (The part about the ticket change didn’t come until much later.)

After being re-booked on a later flight, I sought out different United Airlines customer service agents.

I spoke with a manager in the Newark ticketing department, who was very upset to hear how I was handled. She reviewed my record and informed me that [the agent] had added supposed quotes from me to my record that I have never said.

She informed me that the LAX ticketing agent who checked me in and printed my boarding passes should have collected the amount due but she never mentioned it at all. I have never heard of an airline flying a passenger with an amount due on their ticket and am surprised that happened.

So the bottom line is that United should have asked her to pay the change fee much, much sooner. And because it didn’t, this passenger got the runaround and a delay.

Dooley says she’s “extremely” unhappy with that response. After all, she paid more for her flight and lost a day of vacation. Plus, she was treated rudely by an ticket agent in Newark. She’d like her $522 refunded, “at a minimum.”

I don’t see how she might have avoided this, beyond making sure United had her up-to-date credit card information. And even then, there’s no telling if the airline would have billed her.

For me, the lesson is obvious: Read every email until the end, even the ones that ramble a little. I’ll try to do better.

Interestingly, the most scathing comments that appear on this site and on my Facebook page come from folks who don’t read the entire story.

I used to be pretty critical of them, but now I’m one of them.

  • judyserienagy

    UA didin’t collect the change fee at the time of the change.  The passenger didn’t notice.  Many of us now have multiple credit cards and play the mileage game, so not noticing the lack of change fee is completely understandable.  UA is reaponsible for collecting the fee.  What is the pax supposed to do … put a note on her calendar to be sure she’s charged correctly?  It’s UA’s responsibility; penalizing the passenger is just dumb.

    What’s been going on at UA/CO since the merger involves many mysteries.  UA should give her whatever she wants, the rude agent at EWR should have it deducted from her pay.  Good for the pax to escalate this up the management line and place the blame where it belongs.  No reason to treat paying customers like this and UA needs to deal with their problem … the problem is a rude agent who could have handled this properly in the first place.

  • Adam_The_Man

    What I am saying is she should not have to pay the schedule change fee now, because the airline had a delay and made her miss her flight.  So they should call it a wash.

  • jennj99738

    The lady made a change to her own schedule in February.  We don’t know what the change was.  It could have been that she decided to go out on a Wednesday instead of Friday.  Secondly, there is no indication of a delay.  It says she had a tight connection.  Some people here are assuming she was delayed and that United protected her on a later flight.  We don’t even know the reason for the delay if there in fact was one.  The fact she made a schedule change in February is entirely separate from whether there was a weather or mechanical delay on her flight from LA to EWR.

    The  fact remains that she owed for a schedule change.  She didn’t pay it.  United charged it. Could United have handled it better?  Probably but I have less sympathy for a woman who does not disclose what the $522 was for in her letter to Christopher.  

    Also, people would probably stop calling you a troll if you stopped calling everything that happens a scam. And I mean everything.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

     If you are stranded midway to your final destination and they won’t transport you without more money, and the only chance of getting on the plane is to fork over $500, which you have. That would be a no brainer.

  • Joe_D_Messina

    Let’s say that in the rush to make the first flight, she pays the $500 with no explanation at all. I think most people  would have demanded SOME sort of explanation or at minimum demanded a supervisor repeat the “I have no clue what I’m taking your money for” but let’s say she went along with it….  That still leaves us with the reality she didn’t make that plane.

    So, she’s pissed about missing her original flight and is now sitting around for her next flight.  Yet she doesn’t track down a worker to figure out what the heck they just charged her $500 extra for?  

    But, if she knew she owed them something, suddenly getting an explanation isn’t required. She’d be ticked about having to pay it, but she wouldn’t need anybody to tell her what it was for.

  • Noah Rosenthal

    I’m caught up on the fact that United apparently changed her flight without notifying her until she was in Newark. Huh?

  • Lindabator

    CAN you read????  Back in FEB she changed her flights – that’s what the charge was for – again, like Chris said, READ TO THE END!

  • Lindabator

    Amen to that!

  • Lindabator

    Not all changes NEEDED to be paid in advance – many allowed you to pay at the time of departure, but after the merger, no longer.  So United/Continental staff might have been confused at the time of checkin.  All a moot point – she wonders WHY she was charged, when she knew darn well.  No case here.

  • Lindabator

    You need to re-read the ENTIRE article – SHE changed her flight, they just caught the lack of payment until she flew into Newark.

  • http://www.facebook.com/karen.berger Karen Berger

    You know, I should probably have read all 2000 words of the last terms of service I clicked “I agree” to before using that new website. And I should have read all four pages that the credit card company sent to me saying that they were changing how they billed interest. Oh, yeah, and prospectuses from my retirement accounts: Dozens, scores, maybe even a hundred or more pages of legal details a month. 

    Sure, it would be nice if each of us read down to the bitter end of every piece of correspondence sent to us by maniacal lawyers with too much computer power on their hands. We should know every single detail of every single policy of every airline, and anticipate everything that could go wrong, and check that out, and get it in writing, because god knows, what an agent tells you isn’t anything you can actually USE in case of a disagreement. 

    Or hey, maybe companies can simplify,pare down. Stop trying to squeeze out that last nickel (and relaying of thousands to dollars of legal nonsense to support their position. Maybe they can try being a little more HUMAN? 

    I keep reading all these comments on posts on this blog saying the customer should have known, read, done such and so, prevented it…. and sure, sometimes that’s true. But when is the last time YOU read a prospectus for an investment start to finish? The TOS for a website? The entire contract for a plane ticket? 

    You have to wonder how society came to this…. and to the point where people think it’s okay to do business like this — and to blame the customer for not having read to section II, paragraph A, subsection 97.    

  • bayareascott

    The new system used by United (Continental’s old system) allows anyone to be checked in regardless of their ticket status.  This can cause problems like the one by the OP.  It should have been caught in LA, but say if the check-in agent misses it and it gets caught at the gate, you could be denied boarding because your ticket has not been “updated” for your flight if there is not enough time to fix it.  Yes, the agent should have caught it at check-in, but you are the traveler and you know you owe money.  If you want to try to get away without paying it, you are the one who will pay the price (in more ways than one) if it is caught at an inopportune time.

  • bayareascott

    It’s the customer’s problem that they incurred a charge and tried to avoid paying it.  The OP could have acknowledged the change to the agent at check-in and paid the amount, thus insuring no enroute problems.

  • bayareascott

    She tries to get out of paying what she owes, but GIVE her everything she wants and have it deducted from the agent’s pay?  The EWR agent isn’t even the one who made the mistake.

    It is customers like YOU that is everything wrong with the traveling public.  You are probably the one screaming at people at airports when your flight is delayed 20 minutes.  

  • bayareascott

    There was no penalty.  She had to pay what she owed.  She made a change and owed money, and tried to get away with not paying it.  So you think UA should GIVE her “whatever she wants” and make the agent pay for it?  The EWR agent is not even the one who made the error.  I’d like to see you run your business in this manner, being a tyrant to your employees.

    You are exactly what is wrong with the traveling public with your entitlement.  You are probably the one screaming at agents in the airport when your flight is delayed 20 minutes.

  • Dave_Z

    Also, people would probably stop calling you a troll if you stopped calling everything that happens a scam. And I mean everything.

    Precisely. When some people use “loaded” words with more or less specific meaning rather loosely, it tends to blur issues more than they already are.

    DavidZ

  • cjr001

    Yes, she changed her flight in February. But then there’s this:

    “The agent at gate 74 told me that United had changed my reservation to a
    later flight in anticipation of me missing my tight connection.”

    So, based on this, it sounds like the next leg of her itinerary was changed without her knowledge while she was on her first leg.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    My comment was directed only to the first part of the supposition,to which I repeat, if you are trying to catch a plane, quibbling with the supervisor seems imprudent and unwise at best.  Perhaps you would, but not everyone would.  I certainly wouldn’t. I’d much rather catch my plane than worry about money that I might get back later.

  • TonyA_says

    Emanon, when I was reading this last night, it made my head spin. I was too tired to fire up my GDS so I waited till this morning.

    Note she made a change in her reservation (PNR) last February for a flight 2-3 months later in May. Since the change had a fare differential, we can assume she made a change “for a better flight time”. Looking at United/Lufthansa schedules for May, a LAX-EWR-MUC-AOI passenger really had only 2 basic options:
    (1) Take UA106 EWR-MUC departing EWR at 535PM  and UA9295 (LH1956) MUC-AOI arriving AOI 1120AM.
    (2) Take UA9254 (LH413) departing EWR at 820PM and UA9541 (LH1958) MUC-AOI arriving AOI at 525PM.
    I assume her original reservation was to make her arrive AOI at 525PM because the cheaper fare classes were on that flight, and then she changed her mind and rebooked on the earlier arriving flight at 1120AM.

    You cannot make a change in a paid booking without knowing you will pay the change penalty and any fare difference. Therefore, she knew her old tickets were already invalid and she had to pay for new ones to be issued. Notice how quiet she was about this “minor detail”.

    I believe that the only reason she was able to fly LAX-EWR was because she was on the same LAX-EWR flight on the old and new (changed) reservations. That said, the agent in LAX probably saw her LAX-EWR res and old coupons matched. She probably did not see the mismatch of the EWR-MUC and MUC-AOI res and coupons. Maybe because of the system migration confusion from Apollo to Shares, the agent probably just printed the boarding pass and did not re-sync the ticket coupons. Had s/he checked a little bit more, s/he would have noticed that an additional collection was due to issue the correct coupons for the flights.

    If the OP departed LAX at about 835AM, here are the connection time info for her “scheduled” flights:   FLT.NO      LEG      DEP  TR ARRIVAL TR  EQP  CITY   CT  MCT
      #UA1703   LAX EWR    835A  7  454P    C  752
      #UA 106   EWR MUC    535P  C  740A#1  2  764   EWR   DI   40
      #UA9295   MUC AOI    940A  2 1120A       AT7   MUC   II   45
    Note she had 41 minutes scheduled between flights where the Minimum Connection Time was 40 minutes. In other words, she was scheduled to perfection.

    Since she knew as early as February that she had not paid for her new tickets, checked-in and boarded at LAX still without paying for her new tickets, was she thinking she was going to get lucky at EWR without paying ??? Who does she think she is fooling?

    IMO, This is one of those cases where you have a customer who probably thinks they have gotten away with not paying  then gets caught at some point. They get pissed off and find a kind-hearted venue that is willing to listen to their one-sided story so they can bash the vendor.

    Dear OP — If your four days of vacation is so important, then why didn’t you pay early enough so there wouldn’t have been a delay. I’m sure if you called United between February and May, they would have gladly taken your credit card. If you ask United, I am sure they believe that collecting their money is just as important as you having a great 4-day vacation.:-)

  • Mel65

    I sent them a politely irritated email explaining that I’d prepaied for both a car service that I couldn’t use (the vehicle we’d requested was already booked for the later time by someone else) and  lost 1 day at the park and they “generously” opened skymiles accounts and gave us each 5K miles (including the children, weird).  I’ve never been a collector of miles, so they were useless to us of course :) In the end, we had a great time in Orlando and after a lot of deep breaths, I let it go…mostly ;)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_UES4TUPI6NRPTG2DCB4YCX6R4U wyoming1949

    With regard to derogatory comments about a customer placed on the reservation record:  The airline should be required to (1)  Provide the customer with a print-out of said comments, and  (2)  At the customer’s request, the airline should provide re-booking on another airline provided the customer agrees for fare forfeitures, payment of “walk-up” fares, etc.  I would rather complete my trip by TRAIN or BUS, if necessary, than become a victim of a minimum wage employee taking-out his/her personal problems on customers!

  • bodega3

    Well it doesn’t work that way.  Comments are put into PNR’s all the time.  I will never forget pulling up a PNR in my GDS and seeing the airline’s comments about my client’s mother calling to try and get a change done with no add collect or fee.  She could be very persistant and I guess she ticked off the agent .  It is rare for us to see these messages, but I guess the agent wanted me to know what a PITA my cilent’s mother was.  Too funny and so very right on!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Allan-Jayne/100000343947533 Allan Jayne

    deleted