Could United Airlines’ chaotic computer “cutover” have been avoided?

At United Airlines, they called it the “cutover.” It was the final and most difficult piece of the puzzle in the merger with Continental Airlines, and it involved combining two complex passenger reservations systems.

But some United passengers referred to what happened in March as something else: chaos.

They complained about delayed flights, sluggish customer service response times and rude treatment by overwhelmed ticket agents struggling to learn a new computer system.

A closer look at the cutover and its repercussions suggests that no airline is immune to a systems failure that could affect your next flight and that beyond a common-sense strategy or two, passengers can’t do much to prepare for a meltdown.

On another level, United’s switch is also a case study in how careful planning by the airline’s customer service team averted a disaster that could have inconvenienced even more passengers.

The lead players in United’s IT drama are two reservations systems that handle functions from ticketing to loyalty programs. United’s was called Apollo; Continental’s was Shares. United chose to use Shares shortly after merging with Continental, and late on the evening of March 2, almost a year and a half after the consolidation became official, it completed the process of combining Apollo and Shares by copying the data on both systems, backing it up and then consolidating it.

That part of the cutover went relatively smoothly. But on March 3, United customers awoke to a new Web site, and the old Continental site now pointed to United.com. And airport agents powering up their workstations were greeted by a Shares log-in screen, a system that half of them hadn’t used in a real-world setting.

Adding to the confusion, United made other, unrelated policy changes at about the same time. Those included tightening several rules for its frequent fliers, who also tend to be its most vocal customers. Lower-tier elite-level passengers could no longer get upgraded to United’s premium economy class when they reserved their tickets; they had to wait until the day of their flight to secure their Economy Plus seat assignments. Their free-checked-baggage allowance was also cut from two bags to one, generating more complaints to United’s call centers and straining the airline’s resources.

Shares began to slow under the weight of the extra transaction requests, leading to more timeouts and system freezes than United had anticipated.

Call volumes surged from 1.5 million the week before the cutover to 2 million the week of the switch, exceeding what managers had planned for by 10 percent. “Handle” times — the length of time it takes to resolve a customer inquiry — jumped 120 percent. Answering inquiries took an average of 20 minutes as many agents wrestled with their new Shares interface. That, in turn, lengthened the call wait queue. Some customers hung up after spending what they said was hours on hold.

John Buckholz, a planning manager in Ogdensburg, N.Y., spent more than three hours on the phone trying to cash in a gift certificate, which involves more steps and usually takes longer on Shares than it did on Apollo. “There was no way to talk to someone who had any power to do anything,” Buckholz complained. “Anyone I talked to was extremely short with me and just told me there was nothing I could do.”

Sergei Shevchuk, a research scientist in San Francisco who tried to phone the airline during the cutover, also grew increasingly frustrated. He’d canceled a ticket just before the switch, and when he called to find out about his refund, agents offered conflicting answers, first saying that his ticket wasn’t refundable and then that they couldn’t find his reservation. “No one there seemed to be able to locate one of the tickets,” he said.

Kathy Talcott, a United passenger who’d been waiting since January for a promised refund, received an e-mail from a customer service manager who blamed the cutover for the delay. “Things have worked very slowly,” the agent said, begging her to remain patient.

United says that it didn’t permanently lose any reservations during the transition and that every itinerary, including Shevchuk’s and Talcott’s, was eventually tracked down. The airline also says that the cutover wasn’t entirely to blame for the difficulties but that it might have exacerbated them.

A few days into the cutover, however, it was clear that things weren’t going well from a customer-service point of view.

My e-mail in-box was filling up quickly with United queries. So was Martin Hand’s. He’s United’s senior vice president for customer experience. “My e-mail volume was up by about 10,000 percent,” he told me. “For the first three weeks, I would be up until midnight every day and start again at 5 a.m., answering customers.”

It could have been much worse.

Hand says that United began developing the customer service strategy for the cutover before the airlines merged. Last October, his department started training agents in how to use Shares and briefing them on United’s new policies. It hired 400 new call center agents and recalled almost 300 furloughed employees. “We thought it was enough,” he says.

But United had bitten off a little more than it could chew. One of the critical choke points proved to be the airport agents, whose systems essentially had been downgraded from a point-and-click interface to one that accepted only text-based line commands. Although that was a temporary setback — United plans to add a more user-friendly interface by the end of the year — it combined with the recently migrated passenger reservations system and the new rules to give United and its customers a March they’d rather forget.

Asked whether he would have done anything differently in hindsight, Hand replied that “I wish we hadn’t changed so many things simultaneously.”

United passengers could have protected themselves by having a printout of their itinerary with their alphanumeric record locator number — always a good idea. That way, if their itinerary disappeared into the electronic ether, an agent would have a starting point for finding it.

And they could have packed a sense of humor. When a whole row of computers shuts down spontaneously, what is there to do except laugh? But many passengers didn’t know about the cutover, or its probable implications, until it was too late.

United says that the situation has calmed and that it’s taking steps to keep things going smoothly. Between now and June, the carrier is hiring another 400 contact center workers, adding to the staff of 6,300 employees who answer passenger inquiries via phone and e-mail. Its all-important handle times have been cut in half, to an average of 10 minutes, which is almost back to normal. (The goal is closer to eight minutes.)

No one knows when the next airline IT crisis might flare up or which airline it will hit. A combined US Airways-American Airlines, which some industry watchers are predicting, is a likely candidate. But if the madness afflicting United in March has taught passengers anything, it’s that there are some airline problems you just can’t plan for.

  • dsliesse

    On the other hand, why should the CUSTOMER have to show some patience?  We didn’t ask for this merger in the first place; the only benefit most people saw was getting rid of United’s former CEO (and compared to Jeff, even he looks good!).  It’s not the customer’s job to be patient with major problems; it’s the company’s job to get it right.

    I’ve observed this process from many angles, including the viewpoint of a former software QA manager. The first problem was choosing SHARES, which is a far less-capable system than Apollo to begin with.  Then the process gives all indications of being inadequately tested.  When your corporate livelihood depends on a functioning computer system, you need to test it within an inch of its life before implementing a cutover.  Finally, there was not enough training given to pre-merger United workers.  Maybe those who have been around long enough to have used Apollo before United spun it off (that’s 20+ years ago) might have remembered some of the old commands, but even those would have been different.

    Twenty years ago Delta was widely regarded as having a dinosaur IT system.  My experience more recently is that their system is far more advanced than either United’s (especially now) or American’s.

  • sershev

     Actually I find overseas based agents more helpful and more polite compare to Houston based.

  • Jeanne_in_NE

    “I’m sorry, [insert prefix here] sershev, did you say your problem was that Houston based agents are not helpful and polite?  I apologize for that.  Is there anything else I can help you with today?  Oh, you want to check the status of your flight?  I apologize for that [insert prefix here] sershev.  Please hold as I look for that information.  Yes, I see that your flight number has been changed.  I apologize for that.  Is there anything else I can help you with today?  I’m sorry, I don’t understand “quit reading from the script”.  I apologize for that.  Is there anything else I can help you with today [insert prefix here] sershev?  Yes, my name is Betty and I am located in Kansas City.  No, I do not know how my home town team of the Cardinals is doing, I apologize for that.  Is there anything else I can help you with today [insert prefix here] sershev?”

    I, for one, don’t find *anyone*, based at *any* location reading from a script helpful nor polite, merely (semi literate.  US-based agents are far less likely to read from a script and quit wasting time with their meaningless apologies and offers of further “help”.

  • Joe Farrell

    My point was merely that everybody has a horror story – I think if I could bill the time I spend dealing with travel hassles I could retire. . . . 

    I remember one time being on hold on three separate lines on speaker to three different airlines . . . .

  • AUSSIEtraveller

    actually most waitresses on planes are useless when it comes to safety & if they are 70 years plus, they can hardly do their job.

    Have seen

  • TonyA_says

    Emanon, thanks for your long reply. I now have a clearer understanding on how loyal UA elites feel. Pissed off.

  • MarkKelling

    Where the person I talk to is located doesn’t really matter to me as long as we speak the same language and can have a basic understanding of why I am calling.

    I do prefer people I talk to to be in the US just because it means someone has a job here instead of a foreign country.

  • MarkKelling

    At the Denver airport, there were dozens of UA employees gathered around every CO gate for several weeks prior to the big conversion.  Most seemed occupied with gossip, but there were a few that seemed truly interested in learning the system.  They were working with live passengers on real flights getting them rebooked for missed connections and so on.  I just think most of the UA employees didn’t want to learn.

  • TonyA_says

    I think Deltamatic is still a dinosaur. I noticed that a number of European and Asian carriers have moved to Amadeus’ Altea (suite). Nevertheless, I think any system will have a tough time with United since (IMO) UA has so many upgrade options that most airlines don’t have.

  • MarkKelling

    True, I can tell you a few horror stories from both CO and UA pre merger that would make you go “huh?” and ask me why I continued to fly with either.  Answer is: most of the time there really is no other choice.  WN and F9 are available to me, but each has their own limitations and frustrating policies as well.  So, I just choose whatever airline appears to offer the best flights to fit my schedule now and hope for the best.

  • Dave_Z

    “On the other hand, why should the CUSTOMER have to show some patience?”

    To not increase blood pressure.

  • http://www.talestoldfromtheroad.com Dick Jordan

    What I find most telling (and depressing) from this entire discussion is the comment (if true) that UAL/CO decided to go with the SHARES system to save on software licensing fees since that system was no longer supported by the software company that developed it. And expecting either employees or customers to use a non-GUI based system is a very 20th-century, backward-looking approach to the technological link between the airline and its customers. (Anyone here want to go back to DOS?)

  • http://www.talestoldfromtheroad.com Dick Jordan

    What I find most telling (and depressing) from this entire discussion is the comment (if true) that UAL/CO decided to go with the SHARES system to save on software licensing fees since that system was no longer supported by the software company that developed it. And expecting either employees or customers to use a non-GUI based system is a very 20th-century, backward-looking approach to the technological link between the airline and its customers. (Anyone here want to go back to DOS?)

  • Dave_Z

    I’m no expert, and I don’t completely know if UA did what I’m about to write. IMHO, UA could’ve gradually announced this system change so many (if not all) people can anticipate and maybe make allowances for possible issues after.

    Probably too short or too long, but I’d say give notice at least a year before the actual software/system change. Then another 6 months before, then another 3 months before, something along those lines.

    Of course, a drawback there is there will be people who’ll switch to other competitors thinking they can’t handle it. While not a 100% surefire solution, UA could’ve also offered something…anything…that can give some degree of confidence they’re realistically on top of things for the most part.

    For sure, everyone learned from this. For UA’s sake, they’d better.

  • Lindabator

    but using a web-based system is point and click, not so with the airline GDS systems – something a lay person does NOT understand is just how archaic and convoluted these systtems are – aand how they do not transfer all info over into another system.

  • Lindabator

    but using a web-based system is point and click, not so with the airline GDS systems – something a lay person does NOT understand is just how archaic and convoluted these systtems are – aand how they do not transfer all info over into another system.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=730993098 Erica Shafer

    I would love to know what the management/executives at UA/CO think of what happened. Are they spinning it as a perfect (or semi-perfect) cross over, or are they saying that they could have done better?

  • mwc5851

    We flew United the week of 3/26. We had one layover in Chicago. We had no problems until we tried to board our connecting flight in Chicago. Somehow, our boarding passes had been voided, along with our entire confirmation for the trip.
    The counter at Chicago worked, and we almost missed our flight as they tried to figure it out.
    On the flight back from LAS back thru SFO to IAD, we had just as much ‘fun’. We boarded in LAS and several passengers on the plane had duplicate seat numbers, including a few United employees. They also were manually counting the seats and manually checking off a few people via a printed list.  Then in SFO, the same thing, duplicate tickets for some, plane over booked, and a few had to stay behind. We also didn’t have the upgraded seats.
    It took me a full month of emailing and calling to get the credit for us not getting to sit in the paid upgraded seats. Funny thing was, the CSR said she could see on our confirmation number that there was a system error for the seating.

  • reasonedthought

    The real problem, according to my friends at the ticket counter, was the lack of training for the UA/Apollo agents switching to the Shares system  They had less than 40 hours of training on the new system, some had less than 16 hours of training.  If you have made a switch from one GDS to another, you know that the basic concepts are the same however the formats are completely different and it takes a lot more time to do anything.  This failure in training made a rough situation into a terrible one.

  • Lindabator

    Absolutely – feel so sorry for them.  I’ve switched from Apollo to Worlspan to Sabre back to Apollo, and you’re always forgetting the new formats, regardless of how much training.  Its only through the constant repetition of doing the job that it really sinks in.