Confessions of an infected airline passenger: “The most miserable six hours of my life”

surgicaWe’ve been hearing a lot lately about the dangers of flying with the flu, and the airlines’ refusal to loosen their rigid ticket change policies. But how does it looks from the passenger’s perspective?

Meet Amanda. She doesn’t want me to use her last name for reasons that will be obvious to you in a moment. She had the flu but decided to fly.

This is her story:

The night before my return flight, I began to feel sick, and by the morning of my flight I had the full blown flu, with coughing, fever, and chills.

I called Southwest to bump my flight by a day, and while the rep was kind, she couldn’t do anything but offer me the opportunity to pay the change in fare (about $300). Since this was not a possibility for me, I reluctantly dosed myself with cold medicine and endured the unending stares of everyone on the shuttle, in the security line and boarding around me on my flight and endured the most miserable six hours of my life flying.

Putting aside my own misery, I felt just horrible for everyone I came into contact with, given everyone’s concern for the flu this season. Granted, I doubt I have H1N1 and at least 30 percent of my flight was wearing a surgical mask, but I wish I could have done more.

Wait a second. Didn’t the Southwest flight attendants notice her illness and suggest she fly another day? (That’s what they’re supposed to do.) No, they didn’t.

I was very obviously sick throughout the flight, huddled in my seat shivering and sniffling, and upon exiting the flight, I specifically pulled aside a flight attendant to mention that perhaps they would like to spray down the tray, etc because I wouldn’t want anyone else to get sick.

They seemed unconcerned.

Did I skip a step I could have taken? Perhaps someone else could get the benefit, and to my fellow travelers, I apologize.

I think Amanda did everything she could, short of paying Southwest another $300. She might have notified the gate agent that she was sick. Southwest might have denied her boarding and allowed her to rebook her flight for the following week.

I asked Southwest to comment on her story. Here’s what it had to say:

As always, it is important to do as much as possible to ensure a healthy workplace for our employees and a clean travel experience for our customers. In light of the current issues around both seasonal and H1N1 flu, we are following the recommendations of the CDC and working with federal health organizations to attempt to minimize the impact.

First and foremost, however, all customers should practice common sense. As recommended by the CDC, customers who are too sick to travel should stay home – for both their own comfort and the health of others.

As has always been our policy, if a customer is unable to travel because of an illness and is holding a nonrefundable reservation, they are able to use the funds in the reservation within 12 months of original purchase date to apply toward future travel – without a service charge.

That said, in extreme cases, we’ve been known to make exceptions to our policy. I’m sorry if the agent Amanda spoke with did not suggest that she contact our customer relations department for that consideration, and that she ultimately made the decision to travel.

If an cmployee encounters a customer who has flu-like illness while at the airport or inflight, our employees should follow the CDC’s guidance by asking the individual to use good cough etiquette and hand hygiene. Further, we are maintaining a supply of key items to support good hygiene such as hand soap and disposable towels, cleaners or cleaning wipes, tissues, alcohol-based hand sanitizer, gloves, and, for certain situations, facemasks.

Judging by Amanda’s note, it sounds like facemasks may have been distributed to several customers onboard, unless, of course, those customers brought their own.

Customers who were on Amanda’s flight may take comfort in knowing that all of our aircraft are equipped with HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters that effectively filter the 50-50 combination of outside and re-circulated air onboard each plane (hospitals use these same type HEPA filters to provide patients — and hospital personnel and visitors — with the cleanest air possible).

Nevertheless, we strongly suggest that customers who have the flu or flu-like symptoms honor the CDC’s recommendations and simply stay home.

Had Southwest followed its own policy and had Amanda followed CDC’s recommendations, she might have been able to avoid the most miserable six hours of her life. But surveys suggest most airline passengers would do exactly what she did.

That can’t end well.

(Photo: roujo/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • http://www.cutcat.com Regina

    Re: “Let’s start thinking of others more than we think of ourselves and we will live in a better place.” No, we won’t. We will live in a socialist place. I’m not saying exposing other people to your germs is right. But your statement is much more sweeping than that. I’m not going to get heavily into politics on this site, but I can’t let a statement like that go by without commenting on how totally misguided it is.

  • http://aol barbie45

    Michael; sorry read your letter 3 times; it made no sense at all ; you do not know why she was flying, you are not privy to her financial status, you have no right to judge her based on your financial status period,whenever you leave your house you are privy to many dangers ; it is one of those chances we all have to take.

  • Julia

    Regina,

    It’s probably for the best that you don’t talk much about politics. When one is as ignorant on a topic as you are on the actual meaning of socialism, whatever steps one takes to disguise that fact from strangers is a positive thing. It’s not every public place that’ll let you get away with regurgitating soundbytes while failing to understand them, without setting you straight in a hurry.

  • blah

    Why is this mans chest sooooooo hairy?! Not so attractive…

  • Kimberly

    OK…Back to the story…Poor Amanda…

    I believe Southwest was a bit at fault here. But Southwest isn’t the only airlines guilty. Amanda wasn’t “home”. It’s hard to stay “home” and “not fly” when you’re not there. The article said it was a RETURN flight. Most likely assumption…she wanted to go HOME more than anything in the world. If she could have clicked her heels three times and been there she would have. UNFORTUNATELY flying was her ONLY option.

    She explained how sick she was and they gave her an option of “sure…for only $300 you can stay right where you are”…uhhh…I don’t know about you but $300 is a lot of money to me. I’d probably pour myself into the car and head to the airport. That $300 could help get medical treatment if need be.

    NOW…on Southwest’s side and the side of other inflexible airlines…what’s to stop a person calling in to play “hookie”? Well I would have to say that perhaps a better call would be…for the passenger to bring a “doctors note”. Or perhaps Southwest could have been generous and the check in clerk could have given her a standby voucher for the return flight in lieu of her simply returning to where she came from till she felt well enough to travel.

    Illness is a very real thing…perhaps if the customer is at their home port there could be a different set of rules than for the customer on a RETURN flight. One dictates a possible “choice” (cancel the trip) and the other…well we all gotta go HOME sometime.

  • Brooke

    I am shocked that some of you are surprised Amanda flew sick… I think flying sick is quite common… most people probably aren’t considerate enough to even try to get their flight changed! There is probably at least one sick person on every flight…. I fly knowing there are loads of germs in the confined space and knowing that I could possibly get sick.. sometimes I have, most times I have not….

    There is no way I would ask somebody to fork out 300 dollars just to keep me away from their sick germs!

  • Chris

    Been there…..done that. I traveled more than 100,000 miles in 2008 and the cost of slipping a day, (pay for hotel, etc) was more than or my conpany could approve of…. Therefore, when I was ill, I brough Nyquil or Dayquil to the airport, took a double dose before i went through security, and by the time I hit the gate my symptoms were lessened and I was ready to sleep. i got on the plane and fell asleep before take-off (always selecting a windows seat so no one had to walk over me).

    When I landed at home I went to the Dr. and was always put on antibotics. It seems that flying aggrivated what ever I had and made it worse, from the GERM cocktail in the plane I guess.

    Anyway, Yes. To avoid giving any more money to the money hungry airline industry, I fly sick. I can’t afford not to.

    BTW, I asked several airlines, Delta, Southwest, American, and a few others if there is an option to not fly when sick or possibly when you are contageous; their answer was simple. You can pay use to do what ever you want to do…….

  • Jake Chance

    No one is at fault here and here’s why:
    Everyone will always act in their own best interest.
    Amanda flew because, all else equal, she had virtually no personal consequences for flying (others getting sick is not her problem) and a $300 price tag for not flying (and for the sake of argument, the satisfaction of “doing the right thing” though $300 speaks louder).

    Southwest has an available ticket for the next day’s flight at $X. They intend to get as much of that $X as possible and probably have a formula in place that takes into account advanced sales, stand bys, and the cost of having the seat empty. I don’t know the exact figures but charging Amanda $X for the ticket is in their best interest and being nice and swapping tickets for her for free or <$X is not (sorta cancels out her "doing the right thing" feeling earlier).

    Assuming nothing else changes, this situation will be repeated with most people flying sick and endangering other passengers since it costs them nothing to do so. It may eventually cost the airlines passengers during more infectious seasons.

    Now I don't think we need any more laws infringing on personal prerogatives, but there is a very simple way for the market to fix this. One airline needs to implement a new policy and advertise it. Something along the lines of, fly safer with us because we offer free (or discounted) fare changes to sick passengers (probably will require a Dr note to prevent abuse). Concerned people, again especially during those sick seasons, will fly with them as they can decide their health is worth that airline's schedule or ticket premium (if any). Other airlines will compete and we'll have safer flying conditions for all. It only depends on one airline taking that first step.

  • sandy

    Fly Virgin America. My husband was too sick to fly from SF to Fort Lauderdale last week. When we canceled, the Virgin customer service reps were nice enough to tell us that the $75 cancellation fee would be waived if we faxed in a medical note signed by the doctor. Customer friendly policy by an airline that knows how to treat passengers.

  • Jerry Vandesic

    @Christopher Elliott: Your attendants may not be doctors, but I don’t see how they could have missed this. Maybe I’m missing something?

    I think you are missing something. Amanda told the FA after she had landed. Without a time machine, there was nothing the FA could do.

  • Amanda

    The airlines won’t give anyone flexibility at all, regardless. My friend has a pace maker and basically is told he must get a flu shot every year, even when they aren’t available to most people, he gets them because he has to. At times he has waited in line with all elderly individuals as they are were only ones allowed to get the shots at those times. When the swine flu hit, it just so happened he was going to Mexico for a trip. Would the airline excuse him, no; however, since many people decided they wouldn’t go to Mexico they changed his flight three times on him. They expect we are flexible with them, but not the other way around. He got the Senator to deal with it along with several other individuals in politics and they got his money back. I have a hard time even thinking of purchasing a ticket since that time. Flying is horrible and has steadily gotten worse since 2001 as far as I can see. The last thing I want is to be tortured on the first day of my vacation and the last day.

  • Andy

    The problem here is the airlines, not the customer. The airlines have a responsibility to their customers to provide a reasonably safe and comfortable experience. If they see that someone is sick they should not allow them to board and should offer them a free flight the next day. This is especially true for return flights. Most people cannot afford the fees they charge. Perhaps that’s why when I was on a flight home from Italy (no I’m not rich – I was in the Army) a man sitting in the other isle a row behind me was on the plane even though he was violently ill. And I’m not talking about the flu, I’m talking stomach virus. Luckily I was a row up, but the two girls sitting next to him had to sit there as he repeatedly threw up into a barf bag. In between vomiting he sweated profusely and sometimes his eyes would roll back in his head. Am I grossing you out? Imagine sitting next to him for 8 hours! Truly, I felt sorry for the man. But I was more angry that the airline let him aboard and that they didn’t even have somewhere away from the other passengers to put him. Surely in a 747 there is space for a cot somewhere. While I understand the financial need to fill the plane with paying customers, a small fold-down cot or two in the back should be required just like a bathroom is. Humans get sick so it is not too much to ask the airlines to be prepared for it. The experience was a clear demonstration of how little airlines care about their passengers. We are luggage to them, nothing more. To this day I am not the traveler I once was and that experience is a big part of it. Perhaps if I knew that when I flew if I should become ill during the flight I would be provided some modicum of comfort I may feel a little bit more like a person and less like a number. Perhaps if the airlines didn’t look to cut costs at the expense of basic human needs, airline travel wouldn’t be declining as much and they wouldn’t need to cut costs in the first place.

  • Andy

    It’s sad that some of you are so out of touch with the world. One person even suggested Amanda get a flight out a week later. Let’s see, that’s 7 days meals and lodging at a conservative $120/day = $840 and we’ll estimate the flight at $350. That’s just under $1200 Amanda would have had to come up with. Could I have done it? At the moment, yes. But I can certainly see how others are not able to and no one should be expected to.

  • Baldenario

    Andy: Your experience is similar to one I had several years ago when flying a few days after Thanksgiving on Southwest Airlines . . .

    After the passengers boarded and the airplane was preparing for take-off, the passenger next to the window started barfing, and pretty soon the flight attendants brought him a big black trash sack, which he used instead of the smaller paper barf bags for the entire flight, except when he was coughing and sneezing . . .

    And since this was a full capacity flight, there was no place I could move, but I thought that being in the aisle seat and avoiding touching anything might provide me at least a tiny bit of protection, but that proved to be a pointless delusion, since 24 hours later I had a strep throat, and a few days after that I had no choice but to go the the doctor, since it was obvious that it was not going to get better without antibiotics, plus I could not sleep . . .

    Then, after two weeks of penicillin, the strep throat changed to bronchitis, which required yet another visit to the doctor and a new round of antibiotics and cough syrup, which overall kept me mostly in bed, miserable, and living on chicken soup and ginger ale from the last week in November until a few days before New Year’s Day . . .

    I asked the doctor if it was reasonable to infer that I got sick as the direct consequence of sitting two seats away from a sick person, and the doctor said it was highly likely if not a fact, and since this was not the first time this had happened, I connected the dots and decided not to travel by airplane any more . . .

    Instead, I drive, which takes a bit longer, but when I arrive I do not need to go immediately to the emergency room to get some antibiotics, followed by staying inside a hotel room for a week . . .

    The reality at the dawn of the early 21st century is that most people are so self-centered and thoughtless that they will do anything, no matter what the consequence to others might be, and since this is unlikely to change, the best strategy is to avoid being in situations where you essentially are trapped in a confined space with a sick person and to avoid putting other people in danger when you are sick, which simply is a matter of staying at home when you are sick . . .

    Thanks!

    P. S. My experience with Southwest Airlines, which is based on having their frequent flier program, since I had been doing a lot of traveling, is that once I saw the doctor about the strep throat and asked if I could fly, since I was supposed to go somewhere the next day, the doctor said that I needed to wait 48 hours or something in that time frame (I forget the exact number, but it was more than a day, for sure), so I called Southwest and let them know that the doctor told me not to fly, and it was fine with Southwest, who said it was not a problem and that nobody should fly with a contagious-phase strep throat, but it might have been due to using a Rapid Rewards ticket that had no restrictions . . .

  • trellis

    All you idiots who said she should have “just stayed home” clearly couldn’t even be bothered to read all the way up to the third paragraph of the article, so I’m not really sure your opinions are worth much.

  • Gretchen

    I got H1N1 after a flight. Now I know who (or what type of person) to blame. Thanks, Amanda, for the houseboat trip and days of work I missed. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to wear a face mask, and to have a woman hide her child from me in fear at the pharmacy.

  • Baldenario

    trellis: Could you be a bit more specific?

    I read the entire article, and nothing in it changes my perspective, which to be precise is that people who are in a contagious phase of a communicable disease should have the basic common decency and consideration to stay at home rather than to venture into public where they can infect other people . . .

    What about going to the doctor, urgent care clinic, or emergency room?

    If it is an airborne communicable disease, call first and get instructions from the doctor, clinic, or emergency room personnel, since there are several scenarios in which doing anything else can be just as potentially dangerous to the patient as to everyone else . . .

    For example, while the patient might have communicable regular influenza, the waiting room at the doctor’s office, clinic, or emergency room might be filled with patients who have a more dangerous strain of influenza, or they might have measles or mumps, which if you have not had measles or mumps certainly would not be such a wonderful thing for you . . .

    On the other hand, if one is sick and does not know exactly why, then call the doctor or 9-1-1, since doctors and emergency responders are trained in how to handle various scenarios . . .

    And for reference, soon after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) was identified and it became apparent that the mutants in Guangdong province (China) create a new onslaught of strange and bizarre influenza and other viral diseases like clockwork each year–primarily as the direct consequences of enjoying entirely too many bowls of Happy Soup made literally with everything spanning the animal and plant kingdoms, as well as all the newer kingdoms–one of the first things I did was to get a supply of N95/P95 respirators (a fancy name for “face masks”), including a supply of more advanced respirators that have carbon filter cartridges (which one can get a hardware or building supply store, since they are used by painters and for folks who think that using gnarly insecticides and pesticides is a bright idea) . . .

    But while it certainly is within bounds to seek medical care when one is sick, deciding to use public transportation is another matter . . .

    If you do not have a car but instead use public transportation, then wear a mask–not 30 percent of the time, but all the time–and if you are too sick to wear a mask all the time or do not have the type of mask that can be worn all the time, then call 9-1-1, because you are too sick . . .

    Have you ever been standing in line at the grocery store or somewhere when someone coughs or sneezes without using a handkerchief or tissue?

    It happens, and I do not care whether it is due to ignorance, stupidity, thoughtlessness, or whatever . . .

    The fact of the matter with communicable diseases is that, for example, if everyone on the planet had mumps and was in a contagious phase but you had never had mumps, so long as you stay inside your home and avoid everyone, which includes not physically touching the mail and whatever, then you will not get mumps . . .

    In other words, to become infected with a communicable disease, someone must communicate it to you–either directly or indirectly–and I do not think this is the least bit difficult to understand . . .

    Biological and medical researchers work in laboratories with the most gnarly communicable pathogens daily, and so long as they keep the laboratory safety equipment in proper working order, wear the required personal protective gear, and follow good practices, they have no problems, even when they are doing research on prions, which currently are thought to cause “Mad Cow” disease and at least a few of the human variants, because while it can be extraordinarily difficult to work safely with prions, it is done (although the safety equipment and so forth is very expensive, which is one of the reasons that very few people actually do research on highly pathogenic prions) . . .

    Thanks!

  • Me

    If anyone had a mask on during the flight, it should’ve been Amanda.

  • nosick

    Simple solution to getting sick from being seated next to someone barfing into a black sack… SUE EVERYONE INVOLVED. Gate agents, flight attendants, pilot, airline, moron who flew sick. Sue all of them for medical costs, lost wages, and whatever else your attorney can think of + court costs, attorney fees, process service fees, transportation fees – EVERYTHING.

    No one should fly sick. Airlines should be held financially responsible at a minimum of $10,000 for each passenger on the flight that they allow an obviously sick person to fly on.

    Barfing, sweating profusely, shivering, coughing, hacking… all clear signs. Hold the airlines responsible for all of it, and they’ll stop letting it happen. But the cost to them has to be 10x MORE than what it costs to allow that passenger to fly.

  • Gillian

    I was sick in July the day I was going to leave the UK for the US – which would have been a miserable flight with the stomach flu, but I ended up going to the airport anyway since I, being a student, didn’t have $150-$200 to burn on changing my flight. I flew with United, and at the ticket counter when I asked if I could change my flight due to illness, they changed my flight for the next day with no charges or anything. I’ve had to change my flights with United a lot this past year, and they have seriously stepped up their game – I used to avoid flying United like it was the plague because I had been consistently bumped the four previous times I’d flown with them. They seem to be the only airline, now, that will allow a flight change without extortionate charges if you’re flying to and from the same airports.

  • Alan Gore

    It’s entirely the fault of the airlines that this is happening. Before retirement I was in IR, and I happen to know that the actual burdened cost of changing a ticket date in a database is at most ten bucks. So long as they keep sticking us for outrageous change fees, they’re going to have to accept the occasional planeload of sick passengers as a cost of doing business.

  • Terri

    My husband recently flew while he was sick, but had no choice. We were returning from a vacation in Costa Rica. It was a miserable 7 hours for him, and for me sitting next to him. In his defense – he did not have a serious disease, just a nasty chest cold. Not once did an attendant suggest that he was too sick to fly.

  • hmm… :-/

    Baldenario–
    Vomiting is not a symptom of strep throat. Also, I think that trellis was trying to point out that Amanda did not have the option of “staying home,” as you suggest; she was already away on a trip. Likely your pointed lack of acknowledgment of this fact led him to believe that you’d not read through to its disclosure in the text. Finally, thanks to MMR, mumps and measles are extremely rare in the U.S., and the vast majority of people living here are vaccinated. (In fact, measles has been declared to be eradicated from the U.S.)

  • annoyed

    $300 is just over 1/3 of what i make in a month, so to all of you who said $300 isn’t very much, it is a hell of alot to me. and if an airline told me pay $300 or fly i would fly sick in a heart beat, becuase if i paid what they were asking i most likely wouldn’t make rent that month.

  • Susan

    I helped a man along with two other nurses-I am RN-who was having a seizure on a plane that held 50 people. Typical size plane. Thank goodness he had a pulse because I was thinking where in the world would we lay him down to do CPR. The scary thing I’d that the flight attendant tried to give us the AED machine and he had a pulse. By the way the airline took our info but never thanked us as we cared for him for 30minutes while making an emergency landing for the paramedics to take him off of the plane. He was okay that was good however then it took an extra 8 hours switching planes as we missed ours. No thank you nothing

  • Josh C

    Have you ever stopped to think that others who have weakened immune systems like myself have their lives put at risk by people like you??? Oh for your $300 fee you infect many other people, including those with weakened immune systems that can put a person in hospital and cost them way more than $300!!! I know because when I am exposed to even the hint of a cold it costs me at least $300 in medicine because of selfish brats like yourself!!!

    Angry, you bet!!! How dare people like you risk my life by spreading your germs and diseease!!! How about thinking about others before yourself!!!

  • William

    Consequneces are the only way it will happen. What needs to happen is the following. Anyone who is knowengly sick (ie having or wanting to take medication for the cold or flu) should be held responsible for any loss of income (or sick time) that anyone else incures(If this person is traveling for buisness then the buisness is primarily responsable for said lost income/sick time). The airline is also equally responsible for any traveleres who are infected by someone they knowingly allow onbord displaying any sysmtoms. That way the airline and passengers (and cheep buisness) will have INCENTIVE to show common curtesy. If the airline requires a medical mask and gloves as well as hand sanitiser and makse a REASONABLE effort then far less people will catch something from other people. It will become accepted preactice and people will simply avoid sick people. Right now if anyone were to go throught an airport in the US with a medical mask and surgical gloves, everyone will freak out believing they either have Ebola or are a terrorist. A known policy will reduce this fear and beliefe. We have to remember, a cold or the flu can take a healthy person out of work for several days. It can kill someone who is elderly (or an infant) or otherwise imuine compromised. 300$ is an outragous ammount to charge. Its flat out disgusting. The Airline (not just southwest but all airlines) is literly holding up people with fair chainges. a $25 or $50 charge per person is far more reasonable. Especially since they are only making that much off of someone anyways.

  • pathetic

    To Josh C: With such a serious illness as immune deficiency, I would say YOU should be the one to stay home. Your sickness is way too precarious for you to risk traveling with others. What about people who don’t know they’re sick (no symptoms yet as they caught the disease from a prior flight and the symptoms hadn’t shown up yet)? They are still contagious even though they don’t know they’re sick. You would still be at risk and no one for you to blame! Your vitriol does not solve the problems as they exist. Do what’s right for you. Just stay home!

  • Gary

    I flew to Seattle on a very crowded 737. The passenger next to me had an ugly cough the whole flight. Needless to say, a day or two later I had a fever and felt miserable for the next few days.

    Thanks for ruining my vacation dude

  • K

    I believe that science now allows for DNA identification of bacteria and viruses (if not it is something that should be worked on) I believe that there should be a law that holds people financially responsible for knowingly exposing others to their sickness, which could be traced back using DNA identification. I see people all the time unnecessarily exposing others to their sickness–going to malls, restaurants, flying on airplanes, etc. Unfortunately in this day and age, people too often only choose to do the right thing when the cost of doing the right is less than the cost of doing the wrong thing. What ever happened to integrity? Doing the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do.
    Obviously we would need to create provisions in the law that prevented employers from discipling workers for calling in sick–that is if they provide a doctor’s note documenting their illness.
    If such a law were to be enacted, the $300 would no longer seem to be such a big expense–at least not compared to the cost of getting other people sick. Especially if you consider the possibility of being sued for pain and suffering and lost wages for each individual that you exposed to your illness. Or maybe we need to even take it a step further. Some people have compromised immune systems. Perhaps if one unnecessarily exposes someone to an illness that results in their death, they should be charged with manslaughter. Why not? If you are driving your car and accidently kill someone you are charged with manslaughter.
    Just some thoughts. In my opinion, if you are really sick, stay home. If the cost of changing a trip (airline tickets, hotel, etc) would be such a financial blow, perhaps you should consider purchasing travel insurance when you book your trip.

  • K

    Susan,
    The AED machines that they put on airplanes analyze for a specific irregular heart rhythm that would benefit from it’s use. It will not shock if that rhythm is not detected, but instead will monitor the patient’s heart rhythm. So it wouldn’t have caused any harm, other than the cost of the airline servicing the unit after it’s use. Well, I guess that if the patient was moving around a lot they could have gotten tangled in the wires–probably unlikely though.

    Do you honestly think that AED’s would be installed in airplanes, airports, malls, etc that didn’t have fail-safes built into them?

  • Thunder

    I’m sorry, but in this day and age, if you can’t cough up the fees, then you SHOULD NOT BE FLYING, PERIOD! Take some other transportation, or STAY HOME! Buy travel cancellation insurance! Tell your boss, sorry you’re SICK! and STAY HOME! Visit the relatives some other time! They don’t want you around when you’re sick, either! Selfish pricks!

  • TKJ

    I can’t believe anyone would endanger other people like this. I was talking to my friend the high-risk investment banker just now about this post on my cell phone as I am driving down the interstate at 80 mph in my Hummer eating a bacon cheeseburger. We’re both so upset about how people endanger others, I just had to go online right now from my phone and text this reply.

  • Berk

    Seriously, anybody who judges Amanda for flying as being inconsiderate needs to get a grip, get off your high horse, and chill the f**k out. $300 is a lot of money for a lot of people right now. For all you know, she was home visiting her family she hadn’t seen in a while, seeing a child away at school, looking for a job, whatever, and may not have had the resources to stay another few days until she felt better. To assume that she should have to shell out $300 plus to stay longer, that is ludicrous. Hell, if it means getting a later flight or paying rent, my car payment, or putting food on my table, then I am going to take the chance and fly now, even if I am sick, unless the airline is willing to work with me. To all of the morons who have posted earlier saying “if $300 is what she has to pay to make others safe, then so be it, she owes it to them” no she doesn’t, and don’t fool yourself. Apparently $300 is nothing to you, but imagine if it were $3000 to change flights (like how much it might cost from a more exotic locale), you would be singing a different tune. It was her return flight, as many others have pointed out, and it would make no sense to postpone flying at the expense of hotels, taxis, meals, etc. and if we were all in a similar position, financially or otherwise, we would have done the same thing. If you have a compromised immune system, take the proper precautions or don’t fly, don’t blame someone else for your problems. If you are on vacation and don’t want to risk getting sick, wear a mask. If you have the financial security to pay the fees to get a later flight, then by all means, do it. And to the a-hole that said call 911 when you feel sick, you are truly a jackass to suggest tying up an emergency line to have someone come out to see you because of the flu(of course if you can’t breathe well then make the call, but presumably you wouldn’t let yourself get that bad without already having seen a doctor), unless you are being VERY sarcastic. Don’t ever call 911 unless it is a true emergency, real lives are at stake and tying up that line for the flu is the truly irresponsible thing. Thunder, you are a prick for suggesting that if someone can’t afford the fees, they shouldn’t fly. I am sure that a good majority of people out there with less than stellar health insurance couldn’t afford a major medical procedure after their insurance has stopped coverage: should that person just “not get sick” if he can’t afford the medical care? You are a d*ck. To all of the people that have judged Amanda, screw you. You don’t deserve an opinion because you can’t think rationally. I can’t believe what some people have said on here. You are the ones that complain about everything, sue everybody when something doesn’t go your way, and in the process, cause the prices of everything we use everyday to go up. You expect everyone else but yourselves to pick up the bill if you see the slightest chance that you can force your responsibilities upon someone else. Only the most uneducated, uninformed, or just plain ignorant would expect to fly without the risk of being exposed to something unhealthy on an airplane. This poor girl tried to do the right thing, and you people just assume that she is a horrible person that only cares about herself. Sick people are everywhere. Everything you touch could have something on it that can make you sick, anywhere you go; Gas pump handles, door handles at the bank, money that you get at an ATM, anything and everything in the public realm possibly has germs on it. That is life. Like I said before, if you are worried about getting sick, then stay home!

  • Sophia

    I travel a lot and hate travelling with sick passengers who do not care for the rest of the travellers. Sure it would have been best Amanda would have staid put, but it seems that that was not possible for her, what I hate is that she did not do anything to protect the rest of the passengers. She could have worn a mask and brought desinfectant spray along to clear her own mess. The expense is minimal!
    Why do I as a healthy passenger have to bring a mask along and desinfectant utensils to protect myself against a coughing neighbour. But that is what I do. Once got sick never want to go there again. Airlines should provide and be enable to enforce masks for coughing passengers for the health of their staff and their passengers.

  • Sara

    Although I think the tone of Berk’s comment was a little harsh, I agree completely. Life happens, illness included. If the world stopped turning every time someone got sick, we’d never get anywhere.

    Regarding the face masks: I’ve never felt any safer with a mask than without one, but that’s just my experience, not based on any scientific study, of course.