Case dismissed: They promised a refund but they’re keeping my money

Diana Somerville was looking forward to a week in Canada with her family last Thanksgiving.

But the weather gods were not smiling upon her. Just before she was supposed to drive up to Victoria, a major blizzard struck near her home in Washington State, making the roads impassable.

“All highways and airports were shut down so I called and cancelled the reservation,” she says. “Extended forecasts said still more snowstorms were on the way so I sadly relinquished the idea of our holiday weekend vacation.”

But EMR Vacation Rentals, which handled her reservation, did not.

At first, the company was “neighborly and accommodating,” says Somerville. “They assured me there would be no problem.”

But they eventually charged Somerville’s credit card $684 — the full amount of her rental — anyway.

Why? Because that’s EMRs policy, which is clearly disclosed on its website.

If a cancellation is made more than 45 days from the check-in date, there will be no refund of the reservation deposit. If the Guest cancels inside 45 days from the check-in date and fails to pay the balance due, there will be no refunds of any funds received. If a Guest books and then cancels inside the 45 days from the check-in date, and has made payment in full, there will be no refund.

Somerville begs to differ. She had taken EMR’s assurances that there would be “no problem” as an assurance she wouldn’t be charged. Hotels and condos frequently waive their rules when there’s a storm or the roads are blocked.

She called back after the bill had posted to find out if they could come to an agreement.

“I spoke to a woman who said she headed EMR Rentals who gave me the tape recorder response: ‘That’s our policy. That’s our policy. That’s our policy.’”

So Somervilled disputed her credit card bill. Visa sided with the vacation rental company.

She contacted me and asked for help. I decided to contact EMR because it left her with the impression that it wouldn’t charge her, but then did. (By the way, for anyone who is faced with this situation in the future, here’s a little advice: get it in writing.)

I received a response from Blake MacKenzie, EMR’s general manager.

No refund was promised for this guest (Diana Somerville) and the matter has been closed since January 2011 between the guest and our company.

Ms Somerville booked a vacation rental property we represent in Victoria BC Canada and cancelled within a couple days of arrival but wanted a refund even though our cancellation policies where made very clear to her that no refunds are available unless we were able to rebook the dates.

We do advise our guests to purchase trip cancellation insurance through their credit card company or another insurance provider.

Ms. Somerville did not accept the legally signed rental agreement that she signed and attempted a credit card charge-back. We sent her credit card company the signed rental agreement and related correspondence and they rejected her credit card charge back attempt.

We have a proven track record with thousands of satisfied customers. We certainly did not wish Ms. Somerville to have a poor experience but we do have to protect the interests of our homeowners that list their properties with our company. We are not like a hotel as each property is individually owned and marketed. There is limited marketing time windows for each property. We don’t have the walk in traffic like a hotel or are tied to a large global booking service. Each property has to stand on its own and cancellations of bookings with full refunds without filling the dates again directly harm our owners ability to earn rental income.

Ms. Somerville knew what she was booking and continues to not accept that she signed the rental agreement on her own free will with the cancellation policies clearly shown.

The fact that Ms. Somerville fails to mention that when she called us to cancel, it was not because of “her roads” made impassable, but because of snow where her relatives who reside in Seattle live. Ms Somerville told us they did not wish to make the drive, even though the roads were in fact safe to drive by the time US Thanksgiving weekend came. Ms. Somerville could have used the property herself since she lived a ferry ride away in Port Angeles but chose not to.

We are sorry she has decided to bring you into her dispute with our company and we are sorry she was not able to make the trip to Victoria.

Somerville is unhappy with that answer. She says no one at EMR ever recommended she buy insurance. What’s more, she had made the reservation only a week before she canceled, she should couldn’t possibly cancel within 45 days.

Still, I think she’s at the end of her road. It would have been nice if EMR had refunded part or all of her room, but it doesn’t have to. And absent a written promise that it wouldn’t charge her card, I’m afraid there’s not much more she can do.

  • Carver

    How do you know that the roads were clear besides EMR’s e-mail?  That’s a he said she said sccenario.  Either could be right or wrong.

  • Carver

    Joe

    As a fellow attorney, I would argue that the phrase no problem is an implicit waiver of the contractual terms. Otherwise the words are meaningless.

  • Jamie Q

    Agreed. EMR is a business, not a charity. Not much of a business if they give out money to every bonehead who complains that they bought something that they didn’t read the contract for.

  • flutiefan

    so the OP *could* have gotten there easily, but chose not to, since others in her party didn’t think they’d be able to make it? and this is the rental property’s fault? i don’t think so.

  • http://twitter.com/comanchepilot Joe Farrell

    I know you would Carver – and so would I – but at the end of the day the CANCELLATION was – as she said – no problem . . . 

  • Michael K

    If the OP is telling the truth, then it is the rental company’s fault that one of its employees made assurances that were not honored.

    We don’t know for certain that it would have made a difference, but it’s plausible that the OP could have convinced her family  to eventually come for at least part of the holiday weekend or that the OP would have travelled without her family if she believed her deposit would be forfeited regardless.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1556838763 Nancy Marine Dickinson

    It seems I came late to the party and all I can add is, “Mental note:  Never rent from this property management company.”

    With a column like this, the bad press received will cost them much more than returning the OPs money, contract or no contract.

  • DavidZ

    “No problem”

    Ironically that creates a problem on itself. When a customer calls his/her provider to cancel, they likely (and actually) mean to say, “Please don’t charge me also”, even if they’ll still be billed.

    Then when the provider says there’s “no problem” to cancel, the customer likely assumes there’ll no be no charge or will be refunded. And some of you know what can happen when you assume…

    Nowadays, it pays to be specific. What the OP ought to have done is at least ask what’ll happen if they cancel before doing it outright.

    Likewise, that provider should’ve specifically stated what’ll likewise occur if they cancel even if the customer didn’t exactly ask that bit. It might cause issues, but at least it can make things arguably clear before any action is taken.

    Other than that, nothing more to add on top of what the others have said, especially documenting what was said and done or about to be.

  • Michael K

    Two can play silly word games.  If you read the rental company’s policy just as literally, there is nothing which states they can charge the guest’s credit card AFTER they cancel (which is what the OP alleges happened):

    If the Guest cancels inside 45 days from the check-in date and fails to pay the balance due, there will be no refunds of any funds received.

  • http://twitter.com/comanchepilot Joe Farrell

    Michael – there is other language on the same page:

    http://www.emrvacationrentals.com/policies.ihtml

    which states that payment in full is due 45 days before arrival – thus – you will have paid the entire cost of lodgings meaning that they will have paid the entire amount – thus – there is no refund of any amount paid – so your little ‘ah ha!’ is typical of non-lawyers who fail to read the entire contract and understand how it works – because contracts are nothing BUT word games. . .

  • Michael K

    You’re assuming they actually charged her card up front.  Which doesn’t sound like what happened (they eventually charged Somerville’s credit card $684)

    If the property didn’t exercise the contract terms you cite, not within 45 days, not when the OP called and they said “No Problem” and not when they “cancelled” her reservation, then there is no need for the OP to ask for a “refund of any amount paid.”

  • Pauletteb

    The OP may not have been entirely truthful, but the snarky response from EMR tells me this is a company I’ll never do business with.