Case dismissed: “American Airlines completely destroyed our stroller”

Like many new parents, Marissa Maland travels with a stroller. Or, should I say traveled with one.

On a recent American Airlines flight from Dallas to Telluride, Colo., with her husband and 17-month-old son, she took every precaution to make sure the $700 stroller would be safe, including spending an extra $90 for a protective case.

It did her no good.

The couple checked the stroller at the ticket counter, as required by the airline. But when they landed in Colorado, their checked bag was in bad shape.

American Airlines completely destroyed our stroller. It is horrifying — the only thing we can fathom is that the plane or some other machine ran the stroller over. It was so badly mangled that we cannot open it or even reattach the wheels.

I know what you’re thinking: Why would anyone pay $700 for a stroller? Well, the Malands planned to do some hiking in the Rockies, and in order to do that, they needed a sturdy, “SUV”-type stroller.

Let’s go straight to American’s terms and conditions. According to its contract of carriage, the legal agreement between the airline and customer, it doesn’t accept strollers as checked luggage.

American … assumes no responsibility or liability for such items, regardless of whether American knew or should have known of the presence of such items in checked or transferred baggage.

If any such items are lost, damaged or delayed, you will not be entitled to any reimbursement under American’s standard baggage liability, or under any declared excess valuation. Do not attempt to check these items. Carry them with you in the passenger cabin (subject to carry-on baggage limitations).

You can imagine, then, that efforts to get American to reimburse Maland for the stroller were unsuccessful.

Interestingly, this wasn’t the only stroller the family brought on their trip. They wheeled their son to the gate in a smaller umbrella stroller, and were asked by an agent to gate-check it.

That stroller was lost by American Airlines.

I assumed it would be easy to trace and return. I was wrong. On Wednesday, we checked the stroller at the gate for our flight from Dallas to Miami.

Five days later, we still have not heard a single update on the whereabouts of the stroller. I’ve called daily, only to find that “no entries have been made in the system.”

On Day 6 — tomorrow — the claim becomes the responsibility of Central Baggage Services. But then they have an additional TEN WEEKS to try and locate the stroller before considering offering compensation! And if THIS stroller arrives damaged (which it likely will, seeing as it didn’t have a case), I again will have no recourse.

That really did it for me. American Airlines destroyed one stroller and lost another, and has done nothing for this family.

I contacted the airline on her behalf. It didn’t respond.

“Can they really get away with this?” Maland asked me.

Yes, they can — at least according to their contract. A better question is: Should they be able to get away from it?

No. This isn’t right.

(Photo: stopt hegears/Flickr)

  • MichelleLV

    How does this contribute to story about AA destroying and losing strollers?  

  • http://dreamtravelblog.wordpress.com/author/jt10s/ James in Phnom Penh

    Uhhh, no. At the gate, the OP had a choice: Check it with no guarantee or leave it. Just because the agent told her it couldn’t go onboard doesn’t mean the agent waived the COC. It sux, but dat’s da trut.

  • http://dreamtravelblog.wordpress.com/author/jt10s/ James in Phnom Penh

    It’s because they can’t say: You’re not allowed to bring a large stroller. You can check it, but they’re not liable. If you get past the ticket agent (which is easy to do) and get to the gate, they will force you to check it. The morale is: if you decide to go ahead and bring a large stroller, you’re screwed.

  • MarkieA

    It doesn’t. It’s just more proof from ARW that he is Super Parent, Super Traveler, Super Businessman, etc.

  • Sara

    Seems like one of those examples where shipping the item via FedEx or UPS would be worth it – at least they admit responsibility if the item is damaged in transit. Of course, that still wouldn’t guarantee no damage – after having shipped about 10 large items over the past few weeks and half of them having arrived slightly to seriously damaged (and package missing copmletely) despite original shipping packaging + extra reinforcement (double box etc) being used. But they ARE still paying to replace / repair the damages. So if you have something large, bulky and that expensive to bring on a plane, using a shipper is probably a better idea regardless.

  • Anonymous

     Google story : Jack the cat lost in JFK airport Baggage hanger  , same title on Face Book :-
    Should it be right that American Airlines  treat live animals as baggage in the pet transport  service they offer to customers .
    Then  ( not surprisingly) if something goes wrong like long lists show- loss / injuries and death, they expect us to go away and stop pestering them for how this could happen, and compensate as if we are unreasonably  grieving the loss of something less worthy than a worn out damaged suitcase !

  • Duke Nukem

    LOL

  • MikeZ

    I call bs on your statement about being damaged in transit. These things take abuse from people shoving them in minivans, trunks, trucks, and hatches every single day and yet they last for years. In most cases are even handed down to others. It takes some serious abuse to damage one beyond repair, and if that is done, then the company that did it should ofer compensation. (especially if it is required by the airline to be checked baggage)

  • flutiefan

    you have rows and columns of 10-12 50lb suitcases stacked in your minivan and trunk, surrounding your stoller? wow.

    James is 100% correct.

  • flutiefan

    my airline (which is NOT AA) has a similar policy. we clearly accept strollers, but i advise every customer who checks one in that we are not responsible for loss, nor damage to that stroller, as it is not luggage. i say the same thing for golf clubs, guitars, and other “unusual” items. we used to have to have the passenger sign the claim check as proof of the advisory, but not anymore. in any case, they will still try to get compensation if something minor happens (same as when they get a tiny scratch on their suitcase…they try to blame us, even though bags are designed to protect the contents inside, not the outside pretty pattern).

    that said, if one of our tugs (trucks that carry luggage and push out planes) were to run over a stroller and mangle it this badly as she describes, you can bet my airline would NOT stick to the company line of “we’re not liable”. us lowly airport employees may not be able to make such determinations, but i know our central baggage people would do the right thing. maybe not reimburse $700, but *something* more than a “too bad, so sad”.

  • DAvid Kazarian

    just another exammple of how the airlines dont care about their customers.  I wont fly American because they just don’t care.  I won’t fly United for the same reason.

  • Old Airline Guy

    I was an airline employee, including several stints in management who periodically assisted in baggage service.  Although AA’s contract of carriage says one thing, sometimes it’s just best to do the RIGHT thing. 
    A few years ago, while traveling as a revenue passenger, I checked a roller bag on UA.  When it finally showed up three days later the handle had been badly mangled.  A friend at UA pointed out several things, including where the handle has been pried with a screwdriver to separate from the frame.  The apparent reason?  My business card was in a Southwest Airlines plastic luggage tag, and it was the same time that UA’s unions were being told by management that they needed to be more like WN.  There was probably video evidence of the actions on a security camera.  But UA’s station manager, as well as central baggage service in Chicago, cited the contract of carriage: a handle sticks out and therefore is not covered in a damage claim.  Again, sometimes it’s better to just do the right thing.  Remember the “United Destroyed My Guitar” song of a few years ago?  Maybe it’s time for an “American Destroyed My Stroller” ditty…. 

  • Mardagg317

    That’s one reason (among many) that I WILL NOT fly American Airlines. Nobody wants to accept responsibility for errors they committed, especially when they break things. I think AA ought to have reimbursed the family for the stroller. My husband, a professional trombonist, had his horn fattened by AA on a flight from New York. At that time (before de-regulation) AA paid for the repairs. If it happened now, AA would place the blame on my husband. Today they do not allow musical instruments to be stowed as carry-on, unless we buy another ticket. And I am not talking about cellos; even violins in oblong cases are denied.
    I will be flying on a competitor in 2 weeks and I am shipping everything by FedEx to my hotel at the other end, for just this reason.

  • Mburrows

    Another compelling argument for UPS or FedEx.  Not that they do not occasionally damge items but I have never known them to weasel out of responsibility like airlines.  AND you do not have to wrestle with the items while traveling.

  • Mburrows

    I had not yet seen your comment before suggesting UPS or FedEx was a better choice than the airline.  MB

  • New mom

    I own the BOB stroller and protective case, and while the case is soft-sided, it is sturdy. There are specific instructions for how to disassemble your stroller and wedge and snap it in place in the bag for maximum protection (it’s kind of a pain, actually). We traveled with our BOB under a 60 lb suitcase in the car (yes, we paid extra for the weight at the airport) and then checked it and the soft-sided case protected it very well for the whole trip.

    From the description of this damage, it sounds like even a hard-sided stroller bag – which I have yet to see – would have been badly damaged. It just can’t withstand the weight of an airplane or the like running over it.

  • Geoff

    Smart travelers would know that they should have their home insurance set up a separate rider for such an expensive item. The airlines will never pay what you check. ie. Brand new clothing in a brand new suitcase with all receipts intact, you will be lucky to get 50%. For the second time today, where is Ralph Nader when we need him to take out the domestic airlines?

  • Anonymous

    On the rare occasions I have to check luggage I use very strudy aluminum cases from Zero Halliburton or Pelican style cases.  These are also the cases I use to ship luggage.  The Halliburtons require factory refurb every ten years.  The Pelikan style cases only need an annual cleaning.  These are rarely damaged and would stand up to a crazed tug driver. I woould suggest the occasional family traveler packing items for ailine transport find very sturdy hard cases.  Used Halliburton cases Pelican style cases are on eBay for as little as $10.  These cases are all but bulletproof. 

  • Matt Marois

    a 700$ stroller? who in there right mind would spend that kind of money on a stroller? doesn’t justify what they did, by any means, but 700$? at that price id keep it home and get  a cheaper one for travel