Carnival kicks mother and son off Christmas cruise

This is Rebecca Dickerson and her son, Jordan. A few days ago, they were cruising to the Bahamas on the Carnival Fascination. But last week, they were removed from the ship in a “shocking” turn of events, according to Rebecca Dickerson.

Their nightmare began shortly after boarding the vessel on Dec. 10 in Jacksonville, Fla. On the first day, Dickerson reports that her room was burglarized.

Her son picks up the story,

We obtained door key card documents showing that someone had been going in and out of my mother’s room without authorization, both when she was out of the room and attempting to get in when she was sleeping in the room. I myself witnessed an employee attempting to override the deadbolt on my mother’s door and enter while she was asleep.

Despite of the blatant evidence, the ship’s crew covered for all of their coworkers, and we were ultimately blamed for everything.

My mom was moved to place a chair in front of her door to feel somewhat safe at night. When she voluntarily told this to the second in command of the ship – the captain’s right hand man – she was told that she was in violation of the ship’s rules, and she was chastised in front of crew and passengers.

The Dickersons reported the incident to local police when they arrived in the Bahamas, which made the ship’s security personnel “very angry,” according to Jordan Dickerson.

And that’s when they were removed.

The Nassau police came on board, but upon the initiation of filing a report, the ship’s second-in-command told us that we were being thrown off of the ship, and put an end to the police interview.

It was obvious to us that we were not given the opportunity to exercise our rights in filing a police report. We were forced off of the ship in a different country with nowhere to stay, no way to get home, and no information to go about doing so.

When we asked the ship’s senior security officer who delivered the news to us that we were being thrown off the ship, how we were to get back to the U.S., the second in command simply responded by saying “that’s not my problem.”

On several occasions, the Fascination’s security personnel mocked the Dickersons, they say. At one point during the dispute, the ship also cut off the passenger’s line of credit, preventing them from being able to buy basic necessities.

“We were stuck on a ship with no allies, no justice, and no way to purchase something as simple as Tylenol or water — all because the people in authority on the ship seemed to rule the vessel with an iron fisted Napoleon complex,” Jordan Dickerson told me.

Carnival’s side

I checked with Carnival on Friday and it filled in some of the missing details. Here’s what a representative had to say about the Dickersons:

When Ms. Dickerson reported that her wallet was stolen, normal procedures were followed including an investigation by the shipboard security team, completion of a formal report, examination of lock link readings and a search of her cabin with her permission.

The comprehensive cabin search did not turn up the wallet. A lock link reading produces a record of every time a cabin is entered and what key card was used to access the cabin. The reading indicated that the only keys used to access the cabin were hers and her cabin steward’s.

Ms. Dickerson requested that for the remainder of her cruise, no one access her cabin other than herself. Shipboard team members were advised accordingly.

Later that day, she informed the shipboard staff that she found her wallet under a towel on her bed. She indicated that everything was intact other than $250. She insisted that someone must have re-entered the cabin to return the wallet but kept the $250.

Another lock link reading was done which clearly demonstrated that she was the only person who had accessed her cabin between the time the cabin search was done and when she allegedly discovered the wallet. When presented with the lock link documentation, she aggressively snatched it from a staff member and stuffed it in her cleavage.

Throughout the situation, Ms. Dickerson was repeatedly profane, vulgar and abusive towards the staff.

The level of profanity and verbal abusiveness escalated to a point where the ship’s captain made the decision to disembark Ms. Dickerson during a scheduled port call in Nassau.

Despite her extremely inappropriate behavior having been the root cause of her disembarkation in Nassau, in the interest of exceptional customer care, Carnival covered the cost of flights home for her and her son.

OK, slightly different story. I asked the Dickersons to review Carnival’s rebuttal. Rebecca Dickerson responded:

Sadly, but not surprising, they appear to be choosing to assassinate my character rather than dealing responsibly and professionally with me.

Please know the only reason I have pursued this complaint and was compelled to file a police report was due to this type of bullying behavior.

I ensured them all that I was not at all concerned about the missing cash. Apparently, I should have been grateful that my items were returned, even though they would not take one ounce of responsibility and instead accused me of this whole matter.

At that time, I informed them that it was my responsibility to file a police report with Bahama authorities given Carnival’s gross indifference toward customer safety. Little did I know that I would be punished for exercising my rights.

At no time was I abusive, vulgar or profane against staff. This is blatantly false and obviously a juvenile attempt to deflect responsibility by the onboard personnel who in fact were abusive to me and my son, laughing in our faces regarding this stressful situation, suspending my purchasing privileges without telling me, and finally kicking us off the ship immediately after Nassau police came on board to investigate and invite me to file a police report at the local station.

This infuriated David Perinciola, staff captain. After the police left my cabin area, Mr. Perinciola said “you are off this ship”. Within a few minutes, security Rajendra Negi and James Desouza returned to my cabin with Carnival letters stating we were being evicted from ship and prevented from ever taking another Carnival cruise.

We were in shock to be treated in such a manner as a result of our wanting to file a police report. When I asked these Carnival security members how my son and I were to get home to the states, they told me that is “not their problem”.

Thankfully, the Nassau police and the Ministry of Tourism were not amused by the behavior of Carnival personnel. The chief of police immediately got on the phone to the ship’s agent and demanded that they (Carnival) take responsibility to take care of us while in Nassau and get us home safely.

We have been assured by the Nassau authorities that this incident is being escalated and are continually corresponding with me. It was at that point in time that Carnival accepted my calls and arranged for travel back to Nashville.

Regardless of whose side you believe, I think we can all agree that no one wanted it to end this way. This had been the Dickersons’ Christmas present to themselves, and they ended up stranded in a foreign country. And Carnival must be unhappy, too. No one needs this kind of PR.

The Dickersons have contacted me to see if I can mediate their dispute, but I’m not sure whether my involvement will help. I could ask Carnival to refund their fare, but given the cruise line’s account of what happen, I’m not sure if it will budge.

  • http://twitter.com/johntbaker John Baker

    Like Mikegun I ask why? The burden of proof is on the OP to prove what she says occured really did not on Carnival to prove that it didn’t occur (which is virtually impossible).

    Again … Carnival has had one story all along. Their actions are consistent with that story. Her story changes continuously. She brings up new “facts” every time Carnival presents evidence (as opposed to opinions like she does) that her statements are factually incorrect. Next thing you know, she will decide that the tooth fairy stole her wallet and returned it. When Carnival can’t prove that that didn’t happen, she’ll point out that it proves she was right all along.

  • Anonymous

    The articles you reference were posted later

    —-

    So you prefer to argue that Dec 14 and Dec 15 come after Dec 16 than admit you were wrong?

  • Anonymous

    I have been a friend of the Dickerson’s for over six years, and I can attest to their honesty as well as to the fact that they both treat people with respect and do not use vulgar language.  In addition to knowing them on a personal basis, I have directly reported to Ms. Dickerson in a working relationship for two years and I have repeatedly entrusted her son with the care of my children when I’ve needed a babysitter.  I cannot stress enough what an honest and fair manager she has been, and what a wonderful influence her son has been on my children.  The character assassinations found on this website are completely unjustified.  Furthermore, I’m certain that if Carnival had any grounds for their actions, they would produce surveillance video of the Dickersons that would back up their claims. The problem for Carnival, though, is that there is no evidence of bad behavior on the part of the Dickerson family because it simply didn’t happen. 

  • Anonymous

    You’re the one issuing very bold accusations that the OPs lied and changed their story (e.g. about return flights).  The  burden of proof is on you to support your bold claims.

    And that’s pretty hard for you to do when it’s clear that the OP’s posted the alleged “changes” to their story online for the entire world to see BEFORE Carnival even offered their side to Chris.

  • Anonymous

    I was not wrong. I was using the information provided by Chris. Please show where the original posts indicate Dec. 14, 15 and 16.

    Original post from OP indicated Carnival refused flight assistance.

    Carnival’s response indicated the DID provide flight assistance.

    OP THEN acknowledged they DID receive flights.

    I used the facts presented and formed an opinion…the point of Chris’ column. OP indicated she did not receive flights…but she did. 

    The other pages referenced in the comments are not part of the original facts presented. A simple timeline clarification by the OP or Chris could have put that issue to rest.

  • Anonymous

    Please show what facts in the original post I misunderstood?

  • Anonymous


    Please show where the original posts indicate Dec. 14, 15 and 16.

    Do you bother to read what you’re responding to?  

    Read my post above and click on the links. Look closely and you will see the submission timestamps.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4AMV2JHTEN5BWPEEO6NTSXY6SA ChrisP

    LOL. 

  • Anonymous

    Again…those were not part of the original facts presented by Chris. Please do me a favor and read the original story by Chris and let me know where those facts are.

  • Anonymous

    For all the posters who argue that Carnival has one consistent upstanding story:

    Doesn’t it disturb you that they do not even bother to contest the claim that they aborted a police interview when they kicked the passengers off the ship?  If the passengers were so disruptive, then why wait until that point?  And if they waited until that point, why not wait until the police finished their interview?

    Doesn’t it bother you that Carnival claims they covered the cost of flights in the interest of exceptional customer care?  I’ll defer to any attorneys or travel specialists with subject matter expertise — but it appears based on the entry requirements for the Bahamas (and the OPs story) that Carnival was legally on the hook for the OPs onward transportation.  And they apparently avoided that obligation for several days.  Is that what anyone would honestly describe as “exceptional customer care?”

    Doesn’t it bother you that (based on the link provided by TonyA) a different passenger who completed the SAME CRUISE also reported a stolen wallet and also reported similar “very unproffessional” behavior and tactics by the ship’s security staff?

  • Anonymous

    You stated as fact that “inconvenient truths were omitted for dramatic effect.”

    That claim has been demonstrated to be false: those supposedly  ”inconvenient” truths were already published to the world by the OPs.

    You made assumptions, which in retrospect were wrong.  It happens to me once in a blue moon, and when it does I admit it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HMW3OTJSBDWWRKIEKEKWWM7BEA bc

    Likewise, just because you had a bad situation doesn’t mean Ms. Dickerson did. The old adage “the customer is always right” is complete BS, sometimes the customer is a complete jerk who lies and/or exaggerates to get what they want. In this case, Ms. Dickerson has lied by omission and is trying to get further enriched for something that she herself caused. She may not have been the cause of the money being missing (I wont make a judgement on that) but her actions AFTER that is what caused her to be removed from the ship. Filing a police report and asking for answers from the ship is not what got her kicked off. It was her bad attitude. 

  • Anonymous

    They were not presented in Chris’ story, either by Chris or the OP’s statements.

  • Anonymous

    And you’ve amply demonstrated what happens when you fill in the blanks with your prejudices.

  • Anonymous

    Prejudice?

     

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OSW6Y735Q2LBC5CSZUZBVTTYEQ JT

    We need to buy mikegun a jump to conclusions mat for X-Mas. 

  • Kevin Mathews

    Wow, JT and Michael__K, Grow Up.  It is a very common occurrence on Chris’ site to formulate opinions based on incomplete stories and/or facts.  I’d be willing to bet that more then 3/4 of the stories that Chris comes across don’t contain all the facts of the case.
    Based solely on the story presented by Chris, mikegun made a perfectly reasonable assumption that stories changed some and things were added to original statements.  I can’t say that until reading some of the responses, that I didn’t assume the same thing.

    It wasn’t until after the Chris’ story came out and those other links were posted, that we could truly see that the OP’s story seems to have remained consistent.  So, while I could appreciate mikegun revising his earlier opinion based on “new” facts, I see no reason what so ever for him to apologize for his earlier opinion based on the facts at hand at that time.
    You guys, JT and Michael__K, on the otherhand, acting like complete jackasses, could learn the value of apologizing.  Under no circumstances is it cool or OK to talk to someone like that.

  • Anonymous

    But she DID contradict herself – she CLEARLY stated they were left stranded and Carnival told them too bad, when in fact, Carnival had already taken care of their flights home.  She lied once, so not too hard to see her lying again.

  • Anonymous

    ACTUALLY – coming from a family of law enforcement professionals, I can make that statement without a second thought.  And this is something police and fire departments have had to deal with for years – some people will do ANYTHING to get what they want, or get their point across, or even just for attention. And it only makes it that much harder when someone has a legitimate claim. 

  • Anonymous

    So if someone thinks that the COMPANy is in the right they MUST work for them???  Seems like the only one prejudiced here is YOU!

  • Anonymous

    If you knew anything about cruising itineraries, or cruise ships in general, that might actually HELP

  • Anonymous

    I have been on MANY – and have seen cases of staff removed and passengers removed.  But very few incidents over the scope of things — do not let bad apples like this one set you off cruising as a whole – great way to see new places you might never otherwise get a chance to see.

  • Anonymous

    :)

  • Anonymous

    Don’t waste your time – he’ll just accuse you of working for Carnival — when the question is why is he so hostile to anyone who DARES question this obvious liar.  When she gets caught lying, she still won’t address the issues.  RUN FROM THIS ONE, CHRIS!

  • Anonymous

    Why, because now she’s told a THIRD story?  And the police cannot DEMAND a cruise line pay something for a put off passenger anyway.  They do not have the power to do so, and knowing the reps in the Bahamas as I do, they wouldn’t push too hard with a cruiseline anyway – which is why her story smells to high heaven.  The police barely investigate REAL crimes, why would they get involved and potentially lose the monies they get from Carnival?  You need to open your eyes here, and realize a grifter when you see one.

  • Anonymous

    She lied

    Instead of digging yourself deeper, why don’t you actually show us a quote from the OP’s own words and demonstrate how you disprove it? 

    And while you’re at it please prove to us how you know that Carnival did not in fact wait for 5 days to take care of flights, and please prove to us that Carnival was not obligated under Bahamas immigration law to provide onward transportation for it’s passengers.

  • Anonymous

    She lied

    Instead of digging yourself deeper, why don’t you actually show us a quote from the OP’s own words and demonstrate how you disprove it? 

    And while you’re at it please prove to us how you know that Carnival did not in fact wait for 5 days to take care of flights, and please prove to us that Carnival was not obligated under Bahamas immigration law to provide onward transportation for it’s passengers.

  • Anonymous

    Just a head’s up on this – the cruise sailed from Saturday to Thursday, and this is the itin: 10th – left Jacksonville/11th – day at sea/12th – stopped in Key West/13th – stopped in Nassau, where they were put off the ship.  they would have had the next day at sea before returning to Jacksonville on the 15th.  The fact that the captain decided to put them off at the next port of call (Nassau) tells us a lot.  ALSO – if the clients had been SO upset over everything which happened, why wait to make the police report in Nassau, rather than doing so the day before while still in the US?  Story gets fishier and fishier to me.  Chris – don’t waste your time.

  • Anonymous

    Flatly calling a possible crime victim a liar on the basis of unsupported assumptions is your idea of grown-up behavior?   It’s totally cool and okay with you?

    And pointing out information that shows the accusers were badly mistaken in their zeal is your idea of jack*ss behavior?  That’s not okay and totally uncool?

    Sadly predictable unfortunately, which is exactly why I wasn’t holding my breath.

  • Anonymous

    She said they were left stranded, and only admitted that Carnival had provided flights when confronted by Chris again.  Since they were put off the ship on the 13th, Carnival COULDN’T have waited till the 16th to book them, as even THEY stated they were scheduled to fly home that day.  You posted other links, just wonder if you READ them?

  • Anonymous

    But the locklink only showed the times she entered, and when staff did – she didn’t dispute the number of times SHE entered (so not cloned), just the staff (which that is their job, after all).  That’s why this one smells to me.

  • Anonymous

    The sarcasm flew over your head.  

    Or you think like pauletteb that  anyone who dares to express skepticism about a company’s story really must be a friend or family member of the aggrieved traveler.

  • Kevin Mathews

    Unsupported Assumptions? 
    As the Story is stated above:
    1) She got booted off cruise
    2) Police and Ministry of Tourism got involved
    3) Carnival made arrangements for her travel.

    The main reason for the mistrust is easy.  She sensationalized the story to create bias against Carnival.  Once hit with the fact that Carnival did indeed take care of their travel arrangements back home, she made it sound like she had been trying for days to contact Carnival and it was only after the authorities got involved did they take responsibility.
    Her exact quote: “It was at that point in time that Carnival accepted my calls and arranged for travel back to Nashville.”  That statement makes it sounds like she had tried previously to contact Carnival, but no where previously in the article did she state that.
    Had she put in dates and times and a little more fact then her story would be more believable.  As it stands right now, it’s simply a case of He Said/She Said.

    As far as being a jackass goes, let’s list off your comments that fall into that category:
    1) “So you prefer to argue that Dec 14 and Dec 15 come after Dec 16 than admit you were wrong?” – Instead of actually reading what he wrote about his opinion being about the ORIGINAL ARTICLE, you jump to a smart-ass comment like this
    2) “Do you bother to read what you’re responding to? 
    Read my post above and click on the links. Look closely and you will see the submission timestamps.” – Again, see response to #1.  His opinion was based simply on the facts Chris Presented.  If Chris mis-represented the OP’s story, take it up with him.
    3) “You made assumptions, which in retrospect were wrong.  It happens to me once in a blue moon, and when it does I admit it. ” – This assumes that you are always right and rarely wrong, which in this case, if you bothered to actually read what people write, you’d see that you are off-base in most of your comments.

    So, it’s not necessarily the fact that you pointed out a few facts that were not present in the story to help prove a point, it’s the way you went about it.  The links were helpful in getting the complete story from the OP, but they in no way prove their account of what happened.  It’s still their story against the cruise lines and as a number of people have stated, a simply copy of the Police Report she filed would’ve lent a lot of credence to her story.

  • Anonymous


    She said they were left stranded

    Please quote for us where she uses the word “stranded.”

  • Anonymous


    She said they were left stranded

    Please quote for us where she uses the word “stranded.”

  • Anonymous

    I would expect any commenters who can flatly call a possible crime victim a liar — with no hard evidence, just “mistrust” — to have thicker skin than you give them credit for.

  • Anonymous

    Again, I invite you to show us how the OP’s postings truly differ.  Using actual quotes, not strawman quotes of your own invention.

    And again, if you have hard evidence that Carnival was legally exempt from providing the onward transportation that appears to be a prerequisite for entry to the Bahamas, please share it with us.

    Do facts matter, or will you continue to support Carnival just as strongly if their claims about providing airfare out of “exceptional customer care” are completely discredited?

    My eyes are open and I’ve made no bold claims as to which which side is lying.  

    You might want to open your eyes: thieves exist and supervisors who enable them — out of blind faith in their colleagues and out of knee-jerk assumptions about grifting accusers that you seem to share — exist as well.

  • http://twitter.com/prairie_girls Prairie Girl

    You’re not Michael K from Orlando, are you? 

  • Kevin Mathews

    We live in a Country where the accused is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty.  Right now this story is simply a He Said/She Said battle.  By choosing the side of the OP, you are in essence saying that Carnival is lying as well.  How do we know that they aren’t being targeted for some sort of fruitless lawsuit where the OP is playing up the media before filing?

    Responses to the story are opinions.  Without any sort of actual hard evidence in the case, both sides make the assumption the other one is lying…

  • Anonymous

    @google-e5eabf0d11935de7741833b357dae45c:disqus  — The only side I’ve chosen is to call out bullies who’ve made very bold accusations w/o evidence and who’ve made an assumption that proved false.

  • Anonymous

    BTW if I found information that discredited the OP’s or exonerated Carnival I would not hesitate to point it out.

    Have those who made a false assumption shown any ability to adjust their bold opinions in the face of new evidence?

  • Anonymous

    @google-e5eabf0d11935de7741833b357dae45c:disqus : 

    Note also that filing a false police report is a serious crime — usually a felony in the U.S.

    Several commenters have flatly accused the OP’s of this crime (with  zero proof)  and I haven’t seen you pull out the “innocent until proven guilty” card.

  • jodylax

    I have been subjected to the exact type of behavior by cruise passengers as described by the cruise line. I really doubt her “story” and she should be happy they paid for her and her middle aged son’s flight back to whatever trailer park they came from.

  • Anonymous

    This is exactly why I will never travel with Carnival again! Had the same issue on the same ship several years ago do not disturb sign was on the door I was in the shower and the cabin steward just walked in the room.  I complained nicely and it happened again at the end of the cruise I took all gratuites off my final bill and told them this was why.   Sorry Carnival saftey is a big issue with me!

  • 46Shasta19

    She must have been extremely  obnoxious 

  • 1princes

    Being in dispute with the HAL, I CAN believe this. I spoke to a cruise law attorney, and he said he would NEVER take a cruise. We are at their mercy for whatever  they deem inappropriate or not. It’s one big monopoly. At the very least, they paid for their airfare home, as I had to pay for mine, in addition to hotels, and transfer charges to safely arrive home with 2 handicapped men..
         I will NEVER, NEVER cruise again! It took me 15+ cruises to learn my lesson on this last one.     

  • Gigi

    Why didn’t she say the wallet was returned in her first statement? Sketchy.