Can this trip be saved? Charged $281 for three nights I never used

When Carol Pulido tried to check in to the Puerto De Luna Hotel in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, a few months ago, she got some bad news.

The suite she’d reserved and paid for through Hotels.com wasn’t available.

“They said they were overbooked and no longer had any suites, but they could give us two rooms,” she says. “I wasn’t very happy with the arrangement because we wanted to keep our party together. But we went along with it.”

And then, more bad news.

About 45 minutes after we were in our rooms, the manager came by again and said the hotel was overbooked and he could only give us one room, but he would find another room somewhere else in the city. He was not sure where on when this would be accomplished.

At that point I told him if he could not give me what I had been promised by my reservation I no longer wanted to stay in the hotel. The whole point of getting a suite was for everyone to be together, not in two separate hotels.

Seems like a reasonable position.

Not to Hotels.com or her credit card.

Pulido says the Puerto De Luna Hotel’s policy is that if a guests cancel a reservation up to three days before their stay, they’re only responsible for one night and a cancellation fee. A manager from the Puerto De Luna assured her she wouldn’t be charged anything, and he “seemed desperate to get rid of my party.”

Instead, Hotels.com charged her $281 for three nights of a suite she never used.

“I contacted both Hotels.com and my Discover card and they both denied me a refund without giving any explanation,” she says.

When Pulido contacted me, I sent her case to Hotels.com. It hasn’t responded to my query, either.

So now what?

Clearly, the Puerto De Luna Hotel should have honored the reservation she made through Hotels.com. If it had, then this wouldn’t be a problem. But reservations made through discount sites are often assigned a low priority, so that in the event of an overbooking, they’re the first to be “walked” to another property. Splitting up a party, though, is highly unusual.

It appears that Hotels.com didn’t take the time to review Pulido’s complaint. If it had, it would know that she didn’t get what she paid for. Then again, it also appears Hotels.com didn’t take the time to review my email to it, either. Maybe everyone is still on summer vacation?

As for her credit card, which I don’t mind naming — it’s Discover — I don’t have anything nice to say about its dispute department. Had it even taken a minute to look at her issue, then it would have reversed the charge. Sure, the Fair Credit Billing Act doesn’t probably require it to do anything. But whatever happened to good customer service?

Here’s where I’m a little confused, and could use your help.

I need to get Pulido a refund — a full refund — no question about it. But who should I go after? Should I contact the overbooking Puerto De Luna Hotel? The “no-comment” Hotels.com? Or the customer-service challenged Discover card?

Update (Aug. 29): I contacted Hotels.com again and just heard from Pulido. Her room has been refunded.

(Photo: brianj matis/Flickr)

  • Raven

    Beautiful beaches don’t make up for a corrupt government that does nothing to stem the spread of violence. If going to Mexico makes you feel good, fine. Just be sure to stay in your shiny resort and never look at the actual country where cartels run wild and murder tourists…all while the government looks the other way.

    And no, there is a difference between your analogy…both cities are in a country that for the most part prosecutes criminals. Mexico ignores its problems because the cartels keep the rich in power. But hey, if you’re fine with a cartel murdering a tourist on Falcon Lake and their government not even bothering to lift a finger…well, then…enjoy!

  • Raven

    Beautiful beaches don’t make up for a corrupt government that does nothing to stem the spread of violence. If going to Mexico makes you feel good, fine. Just be sure to stay in your shiny resort and never look at the actual country where cartels run wild and murder tourists…all while the government looks the other way.

    And no, there is a difference between your analogy…both cities are in a country that for the most part prosecutes criminals. Mexico ignores its problems because the cartels keep the rich in power. But hey, if you’re fine with a cartel murdering a tourist on Falcon Lake and their government not even bothering to lift a finger…well, then…enjoy!

  • Heather

    Technically any of the above would work. If you are asking which is more responsible than the others I’d say the Mexican hotel since they started the massive chain of customer service failure by not providing the suite, but somehow I don’t think they will part with the money unless you involve the companies funneling the money to them. So Discover or hotels.com are best bets. If Discover does a chargeback it will be taking from hotels.com and presumably they’ll take it out of the amount they pay the hotel. They all had a responsibility and they all didn’t follow through on it so pick which company is easier to get the money (and make sure it IS real money not funny money) from.

  • Heather

    Technically any of the above would work. If you are asking which is more responsible than the others I’d say the Mexican hotel since they started the massive chain of customer service failure by not providing the suite, but somehow I don’t think they will part with the money unless you involve the companies funneling the money to them. So Discover or hotels.com are best bets. If Discover does a chargeback it will be taking from hotels.com and presumably they’ll take it out of the amount they pay the hotel. They all had a responsibility and they all didn’t follow through on it so pick which company is easier to get the money (and make sure it IS real money not funny money) from.

  • DavidS

    My point is, go after the entity that took your money. Follow the money trail. Hotels (dot) com. The charge wasn’t fraudulent, but Discover is acting like “Peggy” in THEIR commercials by not assisting. A chargeback could be reversed if it determined to not be fraudulent. I would turn up the pressure on hotels (dot) com.

  • Mindy

    Hotel.com collected the $, that is who needs to refund her $.

  • Brooklyn

    Er, yes, but there are these shiny things called “airplanes” that take you far, far away from the border.  And no, sweetie, we don’t all stay in resorts!

  • Bobesi

    It seems that most problems happen with on-line travel sites, maybe most people should use a real agent who cares about the business.

  • Bodega

    Hotels.com is selling rooms at a discount, correct?  What do the rules of the rate booked through this website say?   What is Hotels.com’s policy on their website?  Know these things BEFORE paying for a rooms, especially booking a prepaid reservation in a foreign country.

    If I book a client their hotel through a vendor, then the client needs to contact me or if the vendor has a local rep, contact them.  I ALWAY provide that information.  If they make a decision without doing this, I can’t always help them afterwards.

    Also keep in mind, that booking discounted hotel rates can mean you are handled differently than those who book directly.  You might be the first to be walked.  You might be given the crappiest room in the category booked. 

  • Geoff

    The more that I read the stupider the clients get. USE A REAL LIVE ASTA AGENT. The internet cannot help in a problem. I had clients all over the Caribbean last week adn they all got home safely and they all are getting pro-rated refunds and some additional in insurance claims. I made this happen through ASTA trained work ethics. Get off the internet, make an appointment with an ASTA agent and relax.

  • http://www.allaboutcabo.com Lauriegourley

    I have had many problems with Hotel.com as well and would never book with them again.