Can this trip be saved? Overcharged for her Air Malta baggage

When Linda Krasowski’s daughter Caitlin landed in London on her way to Malta, she was greeted with an unexpected fee. An Air Malta representative asked her to pay $250 because one of her checked bags was 10 pounds over the limit.

“That was more than her ticket from London to Malta,” she says.

Absurd? You bet. But Air Malta’s luggage requirements are clearly disclosed.

Caitlin wasn’t alone, fortunately. She happened to be on a school trip that had been arranged by a travel agent. Her mother was confident this could all be worked out once she came home.

But it didn’t prove to be that easy. After consulting with her travel agent, she decided to ask United Airlines for help. Caitlin had flown from Washington to London on United, and the travel agent felt that her bag should have been checked to her final destination.

“We feel that the error was made by the United Airlines attendant in mishandling her baggage,” she wrote in an email to United’s CEO.

The answer from United wasn’t encouraging.

The reservation that this group was traveling on was a round trip between Dulles and London. Their flights to Malta must have been on separate tickets on a different reservation. Unfortunately I am unable to assist you with charges from another airline on a completely separate booking.

We wish you the best of luck with Air Malta.

I’m a little confused. If you booked an airline ticket through a travel agency, then your tickets would be on the same reservation. So United’s statement that she “must have” been on a different reservation seems to be a brush-off. If the airline has her record locator, it could just check, right?

And another thing: Of Caitlin’s group of 27 students, 22 had their luggage delivered all the way to Malta. They paid no extra fees.

Krasowski is furious. She believes the United ticket agent made a mistake.

“I was standing right there with my daughter when the United Airlines attendant said to her, ‘Your final destination is Malta, correct?’” she says. “My daughter responded, ‘Yes’.”

She says the incident has been difficult for her family.

My daughter is currently under the care of a cardiologist for a hole in her heart. This was the dream of a lifetime for her, after her heart problems the past two years.

She just turned 20 years old. I’m sure you can imagine how stressful this situation was at that time. She called me at 5 a.m., hysterically crying, not knowing what to do. I had to try and calm her and reassure her that it would be OK.

Needless to say I never got back to sleep because I was so worried about her. It was a horrible moment for all of us.

A $250 luggage fee isn’t the end of the world. But someone screwed up. I’m just not entirely sure who — and how this can be resolved.

It’s possible that something happened to Caitlin’s reservation, that it wasn’t connected. The best place to address an issue like this is at the airport, when your agent puts an LHR tag on your bag instead of an MLA tag, indicating that your luggage is terminating in London.

But who should pay? Should United fork over $250? Should the agent, who may have made a ticketing error? What about Air Malta, which probably shouldn’t have billed Caitlin for her luggage?

“This should not have happened,” says Krasowski.

I agree. And I’d like to help. But how?

Update (4:30 p.m.) I’ve reached out to Krasowski’s travel agent to get a few additional details. Here’s what he told me:

I have had no luck at all with either carrier – in fact, I have not had the courtesy of a reply from United. Air Malta has flat-out refused to cooperate.

There were 27 passengers in total. 22 had their bags checked all the way through to Malta, 5 did not. Those passengers that were checked in properly, and had a second bag, were charged $50 by United and had no issues retrieving their bags in Malta.

United’s group department was perfectly aware that this group intended to connect in London, not terminate there. I have made similar arrangements for this group, albeit with different students, for the past eight years and I have never encountered a problem.

Both carriers are trying to cast blame on the fact that the passengers each had two separate tickets – although this is a standard practice and has no bearing on how they should have been checked in.

Clearly, this situation is the result of an error on United’s behalf – although Air Malta could clearly see the error and seemingly took advantage of it.

I think my next step is to talk to United and Air Malta. Stay tuned.

  • flutiefan

    it may not be her “fault” that the tickets weren’t linked, but it IS her fault that she packed so much.  this is NOT United’s fault, as they fulfilled their duties, and it is NOT Malta’s fault, as they were abiding by their rules for baggage on their tickets.
    so who do you blame? the travel agent, which is why Chris is not needed here.

    and it’s funny that at 1st you say it was the U.S.-based United agent’s fault. sooooo not the case.

  • Tony A.

    flutiefan,
    the comment was “but it is unfair that some students had their bags checked directly to MLA while poor Caitlin got nailed at Heathrow”.
    How do we know if the other student’s had bags within the 44 lbs FBA of Air Malta? We don’t. That’s the reason we cannot say it’s unfair because we don’t know the facts. All we can say is that we don’t know. There are 5 other students whose bags were not checked through to Malta. So, Caitlin cannot be the only one “singled out”.

    There is a tendency for Eliott posters to blame the airline immediately without knowing the facts. Maybe it make this site more “entertaining”. However, I wonder if it solves most of the problems. Peace.

  • Tony A.

    Eliott, No! The AGENT should have informed the passengers AHEAD OF TIME (before the trip) that Air Malta ONLY has a 20kg Free Baggage Allowance while United has a 50lb. FBA. And, if their bags weighed more than 44 lbs, they could easily buy  DISCOUNTED excess baggage (1-5kgs) fees for less than GBP 50 on Air Malta’s website.
    Now that’s real service.

    You are always trying to fix problems after the fact when most problems can be prevented from happening in the first place. Anyone buying separate tickets should know this potential problem.

  • http://twitter.com/travelingiraffe Crissy

    I think the TA needs to work on this.  They can confirm how the booking was made and if this is a mistake on United’s part. 

    As someone who once had to repack a bag at the airport in Hawaii to avoid an overweight fee, I now carry a luggage scale when I bring a heavy bag.

  • http://elliott.org Christopher Elliott

    Hey @all, great comments on this one. Just a friendly reminder that the point of this feature is to decide whether or not to mediate the case based on the facts available. The question I’m trying to answer is: Is this worth pursuing?

    You can call me to task for not getting all the facts or doing inadequate research on Troubleshooter (that’s Friday’s feature) which is one of the cases I’ve accepted, mediated and resolved.

  • Guest

    but did the customers request or even know they had separate tickets for each leg?  Likely not.

  • DavidS

    OK…based on the limited facts presented. Do not mediate.

    Based on UA’s response, this appears to be split tickets, no factual evidence of through ticketing. HUGE difference when it comes to bags!

    OP does not appear to have contacted the travel agent for assistance.

    Much of the OP’s case resolves around health issues, hysterics, crying and not being able to go back to sleep after being awoken..at 5AM.

    Send them back to the travel agent and see what happens.

    Chris…what is the travel agent’s “ticketing error” you speak of?

  • Tam

    Sometimes, when I read the comments, I wonder if people actually READ anymore. It was clearly stated that the OP was traveling as part of a group of 27 students. 22 of them were checked all the way through to Malta and had no problems. The 5 who were only checked to London, and who had problems, were all checked in by the SAME person, who obviously made an error. Since this person works for United, United owes the OP compensation. Plain and simple. 

  • Tarvana

    But what if everyone who wasn’t charged actually should have been charged? (Again, it’s unclear from the article). Should United or Air Malta charge everyone else then?

  • bodega

    It is worth pursuing because you posting it so you need to provide ALL the facts.  Your next step is to contact the agent.  There are several red flags here.  When the mother states the fare from London to Malta was less than the baggage fee, that tells me they are using two tickets, not a through fare.  Even UA is stating this.  To be charged by Air Malta for an overweight bag but not UA is questionable.  What’s up with this?

  • Tony A.

    Yes you need to mediate.
    This is not your ordinary ticket purchase.
    This is a Student Group Tour (sure look’s like it to me).
    If you go to the popular, cheap Student Tour Operator’s site like EF and Explorica, you will NOT find information indicating the airline (carrier) used for the travel when you pay. I know this for a fact since my 17 year old son is currently contemplating on a school tour to Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia. The price is very cheap but I don’t know what airline will be used from NYC to BKK and from BKK to some Asian cities.
    If you don’t know the airline, then how can you tell their Free Baggage Allowance (FBA)? In fact, the Tour Comp. does not even disclose the FBA.
    So, how do you expect kids or their parents to know how light to pack?
    Elliott, you need to go BEYOND mediation, you should push for these student tour companies to disclose the airlines they use and the associated FBAs BEFORE they collect money. Thanks.

  • Steve P.

    Show me where in the article where it states the 5 who were only checked to London were checked in by the same person.  I think you’re making the mistake of reading too much into something, rather than too little.

  • Steve P.

    I fear that the facts presented may result in you “spinning your wheels”, so to speak, Chris.  I think that mediation may help in providing your readers with a valuable lesson about baggage agreements across multiple carriers, but I fear the outcome of this case may not be positive for Ms. Krasowski.

    I’d be interested to see the outcome, although I think some clarification is required about separate/combined tickets.

  • BananaBread

    +1

    Is your daughter so emotionally unstable that getting charged for overweight bags going to completely ruin this trip and therefore her whole life? If this trip is so important, then she should just pay the bag fee, forget about it and enjoy the trip.

  • Mike

    In reality I would expect United to step up here and work with their partner on this issue.  There is a cost if a business does not inform the consumer of the various fees.  While it is true a lot of consumers will not take the time to fight fees which may or may not be just.  If United can’t explain what makes the OP different from the rest of her travelling party I would like them to step up and advocate for the OP.  If the rest of the travelling party didn’t pay the fee because they packed to the correct specifications.  Then I will side with United as being in the legal right.

    Allowing a one time compassionate concession wouldn’t really bother me.   Hear is hoping you can help.

  • Guest

    Chris posted it in the comments above. 

  • Tony A.

    David and Chris:
    I have great difficulty understanding your statements:

    1.) David – “The PNR could have been made with both United and Air Malta segments,
    but issued as split tickets. Occasionally this is done when the airline
    does not have a ticketing agreement.”

    2.) Chris – “Just because a PNR is booked indicating all four segments, this has nothing to do with ticketing.”

    David – A PNR is associated with one ticketing “stream”; PERIOD. If you want separate tickets, you need to split the PNR (or cancel the segments you don’t like and create a separate PNR for those segments you want to ticket separately).

    Chris – An agent has to ticket a specific PNR. It (PNR segments) has everything to do with the SOLD itinerary. Therefore, all the *CONFIRMED* segments in the PNR is part of the ticket; PERIOD.

    If you really want to know what a UA plus KM itinerary/ticket IAD-LHR-MLA will price at, just go to your GDS and do it. It’s that easy and everyone else will listen. Here it is:

     1 UA 918L 05JUL TU IADLHR SS1   604P  620A#1/O $ E
     2 KM 101L 06JUL WE LHRMLA SS1  1050A  305P/X $ E
     3 KM 100L 12JUL TU MLALHR SS1   715A  945A/O $ E
     4 UA 919L 12JUL TU LHRIAD SS1  1200N  303P/X $ E

    >4PLF
     CHG BA FOC/CNX BA FOC
    * PRICING RULES VALIDATING CARRIER DEFAULT UA
    ** 05JUL DEPARTURE DATE/ 05JUL IS LAST DATE TO TICKET
     
    TICKET     BASE USD                TX/FEE USD       TKT TTL USD
     ADT01      4178.00                    568.90           4746.90
    *TTL        4178.00                    568.90           4746.90
     
    *LOWEST FARE
    FBC ADT M3E*CIF*Y1
    ADT WAS UA LON 1088.00KM MLA 839.96KM X/LON UA WAS M2250.00
       NUC4177.96END ROE1.00UA XT32.60US5.00XA2.50AY64.40UB
       3.20DB24.20UF420.00YQ4.50XF IAD4.5
     TX 5.50YC 7.00XY 32.60US 5.00XA 2.50AY 64.40UB 3.20DB 24.20UF
        420.00YQ 4.50XF
    * REBOOK  01/M  02/C  03/T  04/Y *USE 4PLFB

    This is clear proof that if an agent attempts to sell a KM segment on a UA validated (plated) ticket, they will be forced to combine it with IATA YY fares. In this particular case, the LON-MLA segment was priced at Business Class (CIF) IATA fare.

    Hopefully, this puts an end to all the speculation here. You cannot get a discounted UA/KL itinerary on the same PNR/Ticket; PERIOD.

  • Tony A.

    Oops. This should read …
    You cannot get a discounted UA/KM itinerary on the same PNR/Ticket; PERIOD.
    Sorry KL is KLM, and KM is Air Malta.

  • Anonymous

    ” . . . one of her checked bags was 10 pounds over the limit.”  Means she had 2+ bags. 

  • Anonymous

    (sorry – hit wrong button and posted too soon).  2+ bags on an international flight sure sounds like overpacking to me, too.

  • bodega

    This is where the lack of information is making everyone second guess what actually happened.  Chris needs to update us once he talks with the agent as we don’t know what information the agent provided and how these tickets were issued. 

  • Anonymous

    Per your article: 

    ‘ “This should not have happened,” says Krasowski.

    I agree. And I’d like to help. But how?’
    ——————————————————————
    I checked the poll results just now and there are 501 people who say “Yes” to mediation.  That seems like a mandate to me.  I think most of the comments are concentrating on “how” and with whom to mediate. 

  • Tony A.

    othermike27, You hit the nail on the head!
    The excess baggage fee is a SYMPTOM of the problem.
    The real problem seems to be LACK OF INFORMATION OR PLANNING.
    There are kids or young adults who probably are traveling internationally for the first time. We all really should have more empathy.
    This problem could have been completely avoidable.

  • flutiefan

    you inverted the statement.

  • http://elliott.org Christopher Elliott

    I’ve already reached out to the travel agent for an update. Based on what he says, I’ll move forward with contacting either United or Air Malta.

  • Jameson

    True that. We should keep track of whats important and enjoy what we can rather than worry about fees. OP’s mother sounds really complainy for ‘a trip of a lifetime’

  • Raven

    She should get her money back for the luggage, but if mommy is still wiping her bottom at age 20, that’s pretty sad.

    Also…I could do without the pity card. So what if she has a hole in her heart or some other condition? I don’t see how that makes her case any more important than the other five pax Air Malta/United/Whoever ripped off.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1556838763 Nancy Marine Dickinson

    Wow, if anyone ever needed to be blocked from this site, it’s Raven…  Totally uncalled for remark.

  • DavidS

    In my past experiences, multiple tickets could be issued from one PNR. So it WAS possible to issue multiple tickets for different airlines from one PNR. Is this no longer possible for a Travel Agent to do? My agency experience was always in Sabre.

    If so, you could build two UA segments and 2 Air Malta segments. You then use the segment select command when issuing the ticket….on a four segment PNR…seg 1 and 4 are UA and seg 2 and 3 are KM. Split ticketing.

    I know this ability (segment select) is still there for multiple segments booked on one carrier.

    Also…do we know the agent erred? Generally the agent communicates directly with the group leader who then disseminates the pertinent information to his/her group. Is the agent expected to contact each traveler in a group on an individual basis?

     

  • Raven

    Oh whine. Grow up, Nancy. I’ve been here for years and if you don’t like what I say, tough. 

    I’m just so tired of the “seniors on a fixed income/special needs child/sympathy ploy here” pity party. 

    A lot of these people don’t realize that let’s say they are injured in a foreign country…they’ll be out of pocket more than $250. If $250 is enough to ruin your trip and cause “sleepless nights” maybe you shouldn’t travel.

    Granted the girl deserves her money back, but the way in which the letter was written made me want to wretch.

  • Livermorebrianc

    “..her bag weighed 54 pounds…That’s a lot for a person with a heart condition to be schlepping around or expecting others to help her with.”

    Excellent Point Jeanne!

  • Janice F.

    … why? Everybody is entitled to their opinion. Also, it’s not like Raven is alone in thinking this: at least 3-4 other comments above say the same.

  • Tony A.

    DavidS,
    I understand Split Ticket to mean, separating the existing itinerary into separate bookings (PNRs) and issuing a ticket for each of those PNRs.

    [Note. I am not confusing this with Divide/Split a PNR - where passengers names are split into separate PNRs.]

    I had always associated segment select with OSI/SSR and seat assignment requests but never the ability to issue different tickets for selective segments for the same person on one PNR. I have always been taught that you ticket for the complete itinerary (Confirmed Segments) as sold in the PNR. If one can do segment select ticketing for the same PNR (without creating a new PNR), I surely would want to know how. I wonder how you would AUTOPRICE only part of the sold segments to find out how much that partial ticket would cost?

    Anyway, the more you try to recreate the kid’s trip in a GDS, the more you will be convinced that separate tickets were issued.

    About FAULT – because we lack information, then we don’t know who else to blame (except the poor girl for over packing). However, if the passenger had no idea what her Free Baggage Allowance was, then I would put some blame on the travel agent who sold the ticket. I believe it is the duty of the TA to inform the customer what the FBA is or how to get that information if they don’t have it.

  • Mike H

    Why didn’t she just reduce the weight of her luggage by the ten pounds?

    Put on a second (or third) shirt, thrown away a pair of jeans and maybe some shoes, put whatever into her purse, etc.  It’s better than paying the $250 since she can buy these things for less at Malta.

    And the “I’ve got a heart condition” card - that made me roll my eyes.

  • Tracy

    +1
    “suitcases that would need a bulldozer to move?”
    Love this and totally true

  • Cyn

    @Tony – it may depend on your GDS as to whether you can issue separate tickets within a PNR or not.  I no longer book reservations, but I was taught that, even if you have to issue separate tickets, it’s best to have the passenger’s whole itinerary in a single reservation.  For example, an award ticket with a paid segment for a flight not covered by the award would be in a single PNR, but issued separate tickets.  I worked in Sabre.

    You may want to check again with your GDS help desk for instructions on how to issue separate tickets within a single PNR.  I suspect it starts with pricing the segments by how the tickets would be issued.  In this case, say: Price segments 1, 4, then a separate pricing 2-3.

  • Suzanne

    Sorry. She sounds like a whiner to me.

  • Suzanne

    I totally agree with Raven. And I vote don’t mediate. 

  • Anonymous

    I have to agree.  The woman is 20 years old.  She is so hysterical over having to pay a fee to get her luggage on the plane that she has to call her mother?  She may have been overcharged or not, she may have had an issue to be resolved but at the time, either fix the problem at the airport by moving stuff around, giving to friends to carry on or pay the fee and get on with your trip.  How would her mother be able to handle it from 5,000 miles away?  I don’t understand all of this hysteria.  My mother (if I called her which I would not) would have told me, “Oh, for heavens sake, stop your crying and handle it.” 

  • http://www.facebook.com/andrelot Andre Lot

    There is something I couldn’t understand after reading the post: after all, did the group have a single ticket with multiple carriers or independent tickets? Single ticketing with multiple carriers is run-of-the-mill stuff, and in most cases your transcontinental luggage allowance applies for the whole trip (you can read that from the baggage allowance info on the e-ticket).

    However, I know of some semi-official arrangement by which people issue separate tickets and then manage to have their luggage sent to their final destination via a collaborative check-in agent in the origin point. Essentially, if an airline receives a tagged ticket at a point of connection (London, in the case) it can’t charge the costumer for any excess luggage

  • Wayne Dayton

    If most of the pax didn’t bave to pay, and they were all on the same file, then it is clearly not the TA’s fault, but some underworked lifer at UA’s IAD counter who couldn’t be bothered to do his/her job correctly.  Take UA to Small Claims Court…guaranteed they won’t show, and you will attain a judgment against them.  Then go to IAD to collect on a tremendously busy day, i.e. 3-days before Christmas…with a Writ of Seizure on a tug, to bottleneck their operations.  You will be paid in seconds…but only accept cash, no checks or promises to pay.

  • Wjkorange

    leave   it  to  the  travel  agent    ,  it will  never  get   solved

  • Ckbtvl

    As a travel agent, I would have to ask Iatan and ASTA for advise and assistance. Issueing 2 separate tickets is not the best thing in the world, but it sometimes happens. How did Air Malta find out that the luggage was overweight? Did they reclaim the luggage in London? Did some get checked through and some only to London? There are a lot of questions before blame is assessed. I do believe that the travel agent wants to help, no he is not the responsible party. I believe each airlinr wants to shift blame. But how was the overweight discovered? Scales are not calibrated eaqually, never overpack. She should have just bought a piece of junk in Heathrow and paid for a 2nd piece.

  • Tony A.

                 *** Does IATA Resolution 302 apply in this case? ***

    If all the UA and KM flights were on one ticket, then the effect of IATA 302 is a no brainer – the UA Free Baggage Allowance will apply since they were the MOST SIGNIFICANT CARRIER. Also, the US Exceptions will apply.
    If indeed, Caitlin was holding an interline ticket, then UA should have tagged her bags all the way to Malta and Air Malta must comply with the UA’s FBA.

    However, if separate tickets were issued, then there was NO INTERLINING to begin with. So for the LON-MLA flights, Caitlin’s FBA is clearly 20kg. on Air Malta.

    This is the crux of the issue. You need to see her airline ticket(s); then you be the judge.

    *** IATA Baggage Resolution 302 related to baggage provision ***

    RESOLVED that,

    Unless otherwise agreed the following baggage provisions selection process should apply for interline journeys

    1) Baggage provisions are defined as free baggage allowance rules and baggage charges2) For the purposes of baggage provisions selection, the following 4 step process should

    apply for interline journeys:

    a) Step 1:
    If the published baggage provisions among all participating carriers are the same; these provisions will apply.

    b) Step 2:
    Where the one or more published baggage
    provisions differ between participating carriers, apply any common
    provisions and where provisions differ the published baggage provisions
    of the Most Significant Carrier (MSC).
    (In case of code share flights this will be the Operating Carrier,
    unless that carrier publishes a rule stipulating that it will be the
    Marketing Carrier).

    c) Step 3:
    If the MSC does not publish baggage provisions
    for the journey concerned apply the published baggage provisions of the
    carrier accepting the baggage at check-in.

    d) Step 4:
    If the carrier accepting the baggage at check-in
    does not publish baggage provisions for the interline journey concerned
    apply the published baggage provisions of each operating airline
    sector-by-sector.

    MOST SIGNIFICANT CARRIER (MSC)

    3) the MSC is.
    a) For travel between two or more IATA areas, the
    carrier performing carriage on the first sector that crosses from one
    area to another.
    Exception: IATA area 123 only, the carrier providing carriage on the
    first sector that crosses between IATA area 1 and IATA area 2.b) For travel between IATA Tariff sub-areas, the
    carrier performing carriage on the first sector that crosses from one
    sub-area to another.c) For travel within a IATA Tariff sub-area, the carrier performing carriage on the first international sector.

    U.S. Exception (US DOT Order 2009-9-20(a) For passengers whose ultimate ticketed origin
    or destination is a U.S. point, the baggage provisions selected at the
    beginning of the itinerary shall apply throughout the itinerary,
    regardless of stopovers, and(b) in the case of code-share flights that
    include a point in the United States, the Most Significant Carrier (MSC)
    shall be the Marketing Carrier.

                          *** FAQ’s on IATA Resolution 302 ***

    IATA Resolution 302: changes to baggage allowance effective 1 April 2011
    The IATA Resolutions 300/301 will expire on 31 March 2011 and replaced with IATA Resolution 302 starting 1 April 2011.
    Before IATA Resolution 302, the IATA
    Resolutions 300 and 301 established free baggage allowance rules for
    checked and carry-on items and the calculation of excess baggage charges
    for interline travel utilising the piece and weight systems. Both IATA
    Resolutions 300 and 301 included “Default Allowances” that should be
    applied to ticketed segments if an airline did not file specific
    allowances.

    Come 1 April 2011, the IATA Resolution
    302 will introduce the concept of the “Most Significant Carrier” (MSC)
    to govern the application of whose rules to apply in interline travel. IATA Resolution 302 does not
    include any provision for “Default Allowances” and requires all carriers
    to publish their Baggage Allowances. If this information is not
    available, the baggage allowance for that segment(s) will be blank and
    contain no baggage allowance information.

    This is not the same as ‘NIL’ or that there is no free
    baggage allowance. In this case, baggage allowance will only be
    confirmed by the airline checking in the bags on the day of travel since
    no information was available at time of pricing/ticketing.

    1. How is baggage governed?
    IATA Tariff Composite Resolutions 300 and 301 previously established rules for free baggage
    allowances for checked and carry-on items and the calculation of excess
    baggage charges for interline travel. Baggage allowances and charges
    were usually based on fare component or sector under Resolutions 300 and
    301.
     
    2. What was Resolution 300?
    Resolution 300 established the Baggage Allowance Weight System that:
    •     Applied to markets other than To/From Canada, USA/U.S. Territories, TC31 and TC1 with some exceptions
    •     Set free baggage allowance (FBA) per cabin: F (40kg), C (30kg), Y (20kg)
    •     Specified excess baggage charges (EBC) by weight
     
    3. What was Resolution 301?
    Resolution
    301, the Baggage Allowance Piece System, was implemented because the
    U.S. Department of Transportation  (D.O.T.) authorities deemed baggage
    rules for weight limits unlawful, resulting in application of the
    “piece” system for itineraries to/from the U.S. that: 
    •     Applied to markets To/From Canada, USA/U.S. Territories , TC31 and TC1 with some exceptions
    •     Specified free baggage allowance (FBA) by cabin for F/C (2 pieces), Y (2 pieces with total size limitations)
    •     Included excess baggage charge (EBC) by piece, with charges varying by market
     
    4. What is changing in 2011?
    Recognizing
    the industry requirement for more flexible baggage allowance and charge
    capabilities, IATA announced the expiration of Resolution 300 and 301
    effective March 31, 2011. This results in the elimination of all
    existing industry baggage weight and piece defaults.
     
    The
    new industry guidelines covered in IATA Resolution 302, become
    effective April 1, 2011 and specifically govern the handling of baggage
    and issues that arise when airlines participate in an interline journey
    and apply different baggage rules.
     
    5. What is Resolution 302?
    Resolution
    302 governs baggage allowances and charges, using the concept of the
    Most Significant Carrier (MSC) to determine whose baggage rules to use
    in an interline itinerary. These rules are based on bag travel (bag
    journey), which is from when a bag is checked in until it is picked up.
    Under Resolution 302, the Operating Carrier is generally the MSC,
    especially for code-share flights.
     
    Resolution 302 applies to all airlines, participating airlines in the GDS and Airline Solutions customers in
    the CRS. Resolution 302 impacts all subscribers, including travel
    agencies and online agencies.
     
    6. What about U.S. Department of Transportation rules?
    In the case of code-share flights that include a U.S. origin or destination, the Most Significant Carrier is the Marketing Carrier. System processing will follow established principles and the baggage provisions selected at the beginning of the itinerary must apply throughout the journey, regardless of stopover.  D.O.T. ruling does not apply for itineraries that include U.S. VIA points only.
     
    7. How is baggage allowance filed? 
    IATA
    had appointed ATPCO to be the official data compiler for distribution
    to system provider. Hence, carrier will have to file their baggage
    allowance and charges with ATPCO.   
     
    8. What is the ATPCO automated baggage solution?
    The ATPCO automated baggage solution will enable carriers to file baggage data,including allowances and charges, for transmission to system providers, similar to the way airlines distribute fare and rule information today. 

     
    9ef

  • Sershev

    Clearly I don’t see why Unuted has to do anything with $250 charged by Air Malta. But I trust Air Malta should refund the charge due to an error or just because it would be the right thing to do.

  • Sershev

    Clearly I don’t see why Unuted has to do anything with $250 charged by Air Malta. But I trust Air Malta should refund the charge due to an error or just because it would be the right thing to do.

  • Julie

    Air Malta charge $20 per kg excess baggage.  If Caitlin was charged $250, she must have been more than 10 pounds over the limit. Sounds more like 25 pounds to me.