Can this trip be saved? Broken out at the Bellagio

This is what Laura Buckner looked like after her second night at the Bellagio in Las Vegas.

“I have never had acne in my life,” she says. “I look like the ‘before’ picture.”

Yeah, that looks kinda painful.

What happened?

The second morning of our trip, I woke up with a horrible rash on my face. The only thing I could pinpoint was, the night before I used the hotel’s bar soap and washcloth to wash my face.

A hotel representative came to her room and wrote up a report. When she got home, a voice mail from the hotel was waiting for her.

The Bellagio has offered to invite me back for three nights and two comped buffets. The only thing is, I already get this offered from their casino’s player’s card.

For Buckner, the offer doesn’t begin to address her problem. On the day of her reaction, she’d planned to see a show at the Mirage. It took away from the experience. She also couldn’t visit the pool.

“I was too freaked out to go,” she said, adding, “it ruined the trip.”

“Do you think what they are offering is fair?” she asks.

Good question. If the offer is redundant — which is to say, if the Bellagio is making her an offer that it has already made — then I think an argument can be made that the apology is less than genuine.

We’ve seen some half-hearted gestures from hotels recently, like the Best Western property that invited a guest back to stay in what by one account was a bedbug-infested room. Is this just another apology that the hotel knows Buckner will refuse?

On the other hand, can we be certain that Buckner reacted to something from the Bellagio? Perhaps she ate something at a restaurant that made her break out? Then again, she could have had a reaction to the dry air in Las Vegas (I’m not a medical professional, so my uninformed conjecture is just that).

What do you think? Should I mediate this case?

A survey of more than 600 readers answers that question pretty definitively.

  • Walt Blackadar

    No, do not moderate this one.

    First off, there’s no proof that the hotel soap or washcloth caused any of this. It could be an allergic reaction to food, makeup, sun/wind or any number of other things. As a side note, it seems that if the OP had a reaction to the soap or the facecloth, the same rash would quite possibly also be on her hands.

    Secondly, that’s not so bad that it should prevent anyone from going to the pool or should ruin a show at the Mirage. What, was she scheduled to perform at the Mirage? Otherwise, how did a facial rash ruin the experience unless the OP let it ruin the experience? Overreactions on the part of the OP aren’t the fault of the hotel.

    Finally, the OP doesn’t say that the offer wasn’t in lieu of the one that they get for having the casino player’s card. So unless that’s the case, I don’t see where the Bellagio is being stingy on their offer. It seems that Bellagio made a reasonable, considerate response and offer to a problem that may not even be caused by them. I also think that the OP grossly overreacted to the situation and was her own worst enemy.

  • Ruth

    I said no because it seemed to me that Laura didn’t really do what a reasonable person should do in this instance (or perhaps she didn’t inform you of it) which is to see a doctor. When I was on a trip in Italy and had a rash on my leg, I went to a local pharmacy and talked to the pharmacist who recommended a cream that worked beautifully; however, if the cream hadn’t worked, the next step was a doctor, not to request compensation from the hotel. She is concluding that it was the soap/wash cloth, but it could have been any number of causes.

  • Marc

    I think the Bellagio’s offer is quite generous (especially for that property). It shouldn’t matter that she already received some comps from the Players Club. If I’m interpreting this properly, the Bellagio is offering her an additional 3 nights and 2 comp’d buffets (btw… 3 nights at the Bellagio is easily about $500 depending on the nights).

    As you correctly point out, she could also have had a reaction to something she ate so we really don’t know for sure that it was the water/washcloth/soap that made her break out.

    Given the generosity of the Bellagio in this case (one of the stingier MGM properties on the strip when it comes to giving out comps), I’d say she should take the offer. Unless of course she had lasting harm done. The article doesn’t say when the rash cleared up.

  • Mike Z

    Voted no. She could easily call the hotel herself and speak with someone in the front office. If her play there really rates 3 nights and some comped buffets then she should be able to speak with someone who can offer more once they hear what happened. It doesn’t appear that she even tried according to what I read. Until she calls back and speaks with someone higher up, how does she know they won’t do anything else for her?

    Also, the picture shows a slight rash and the rash in no way should have affected her plans there. If you think you have sensitive skin you should watch out for what you put on it. nearly every company sells travel sizes of their product and she could easily pack an extra travel size bar of soap. I’ve had a reaction to a laundry detergent once even though their other scents of the same brand didn’t cause any reaction. you live and learn.

    As far as the lack of humidity, it actually decreases acne and other skin problems in my experience. A week in Vegas always leaves my skin better off than when I left.

  • iamltr

    No, there is no way of proving that she got the hives from the hotel. As someone who suffers from Urticaria, otherwise known as chronic hives, if I didn’t go out each time my face was covered in hives, I would never be able to leave the house.

  • Carrie Charney

    Give me a break. It ruined her evening, but didn’t bother her enough to consult with a doctor? I voted no on this one, contrary to the way I usually vote.

  • Sarah Di

    I voted no because rashes can occur for any reason and she really has no proof that it was the soap or washcloth. Plus, unless there was something wrong with the soap or washcloth, you can’t really hold the hotel responsible. Perhaps she’s sensitive to certain types of soap or allergic to the laundry soap they use? If that’s the case, I don’t see how the hotel can be responsible.

  • Annette

    Oh absolutely do NOT mediate this case. There’s nothing to mediate! Unfortunate things happen all the time, we can’t go looking for compensation for all of them. I can sympathise with Ms Buckner, I have sensitive skin and allergies myself. But to hold the hotel responsible for not enjoying the show and not going to the pool?! Ridiculous. I’ve had migraines from MSG in food at restaurants but I don’t ask them for compensation because it made the next few days less than enjoyable. If that was the norm then can you imagine all the people you’d expect conversation from? I also note Ms Buckner’s letter does not mention whether or not she knew she has sensitive skin – it says she’s never had acne which is completely unrelated and totally irrelevant.

    The fact that she already receives the same offer from the player’s club is also irrelevant. Is the hotel supposed to offer more to her than it would to anyone else because of that? I think their offer is actually surprisingly generous given the circumstances.

  • Steve

    Well, I don’t think you should mediate this mainly because even if the soap gave her a rash – so what? Presumably the vast majority of guests used the soap and did not have an allergic reaction. It’s unfortunate that this ruined her trip, but it’s not really the hotel’s fault that someone had a reaction to something in the soap they provide. I would feel differently if she believed she had been bitten by a bug, or something like that (where the hotel should have done something to prevent it).

    OTOH…she does have a point about the hotel’s offer. Las Vegas hotels tend to be pretty generous with free rooms for gamblers; when we returned from Vegas, my email inbox was overflowing with offers for 2 or 3 free nights. We didn’t get anything from the Bellagio, but then we hardly gambled there at all. I do agree that the Bellagio’s seemingly generous offer isn’t really worth anything if it’s what she normally gets from them. I just feel that she probably doesn’t deserve anything in the first place.

  • BucksterSF

    I said no, because this is just life. Sometimes you have a reaction to something, especially in foreign environs. It’s not like the hotel did anything to her – I think they went out of their way. And sure it looks bad, but a face rash ruin a trip? It wouldn’t be my first choice of ailment but it certainly wouldn’t stop me from doing anything.

  • Aaron

    I also voted no. Even if she had a reaction to the hotel’s soap or the detergent they use for their towels, I can’t see how this is the Bellagio’s fault.

    If we’re going to get fair treatment from the travel industry, things have to go both ways. Save your efforts for situations where the company in question is behaving badly. This was just an accident. We have become so intent on blaming people in this country that we can’t seem to accept that sometimes things just happen. Shame on Ms. Buckner for trying to get Bellagio to pay for this, when there are people who have actually been wronged that really need your help.

  • Di

    I don’t think you should mediate either. As someone who suffers from allergies, should I have an attack at a hotel, it is not the hotel’s fault (unless I was given a smoking room when I requested a non-smoking one). It is quite possible that she did have a reaction to either the soap or the towel; the hotel may have switched recently. However, it only take a few minutes to find a drug store and pick up some topical cream to take care of the rash. It is not the hotel’s fault that she decided to miss the show or the pool. It was the fault of her body overreacting. I think she is looking for something free, especially since she points out that the offer given to her was the same as the benefits of the card. The most the hotel should have done is point her in the direction of a pharmacy.

  • Doug

    You should not mediate this disagreement. I don’t think it was the hotels fault that she had a reaction to the soap they provided gratis. People with sensitive skin need to be more vigilant about what they use on their face. Most bar soap (hand/body soap) is way to harsh (too much detergent) to use on sensitive body parts like your face. Combine that with a wash cloth, it is like exfoliating your face with bleach. Most hotels, even 5-star properties, do not provide facial soap, and it is up to the hotel guest to use the best products for their skin, even if they have to bring them from home.

  • Sarah

    Voted no. It wasn’t bad and it certainly would not have been enough for the average person to give up on their vacation. Especially since she never bothered to see a doctor.

  • LoriAnn

    I voted no. A dose of benadryl or a topical cream would have helped clear up the rash. As someone who is not normally allergic to things, I have occasionally had rashes from wind, the ocean, pool water and detergents. Rather than letting this ruin her trip she should have stopped at a pharmacy or visited a doctor if it was really bad. The hotel was generous to offer her anything.

  • http://nmdfreelance.com Nancy Dickinson

    I voted yes on the poll and wish I could change my vote. It was early, I was tired, I hadn’t had my first cup of tea…

    The photo doesn’t show a serious enough “injury” to warrant anything more than, oh, changing the pillow cases, IMHO. It’s not as though her entire face broke out. It’s not as though she had this rash all over her body.

    It occurs to me, as I write this, that this could be a simple matter of – it was hot in the room, they didn’t turn down the air and she got a case of prickly heat. It’s just the one cheek, probably the one that rested on the pillow. It shouldn’t have ruined her entire trip. In a quick glance, the article doesn’t say where the OP is from. Going from the humid East to the dry West (and vice versa) can cause a slight break out. Get some Benedryl lotion and spend the day at the pool.

    Heck, I was on a trip once and sprained an ankle on the third day after falling down some stairs at a small inn. I wasn’t able to see a doctor until I got home 4 days later. I just put on my hiking boots to support the ankle and went on my way. I didn’t contact the inn’s owners about any kind of compensation, I didn’t make a huge fuss, I didn’t write letters to an ombudsman. I simply moved one – stuff happens and I sure wasn’t going to allow the rest of a pretty amazing trip be ruined by an accident.

    The OP should consider themselves lucky to have gotten the offer they did. Please.

  • Liz

    I’ve never seen the peanut gallery all on one page!

    Also voted no; the hotel offered an extremely generous settlement for something that is arguably not their fault.

  • DonTheGeek

    Not to pile on, Ok I’m piling on as well. I voted No. It sounds like she was the only one affected and only on her cheek. Could something provided by the hotel have caused this reaction, yes. But without more information it is difficult to equate a small rash to so much of a payback.

  • Aaron

    I’m with everyone else. If a trip is cut short because of a hotel-induced medical condition, there’d better be a doctor involved.

    If you have sensitive skin, especially in hot dry climates, you might need to bring your own soap on vacation.

    And I can’t for the life of me figure out why that skin would prevent someone from seeing a show at the Mirage.

    Skip this one.

  • Grant Ritchie

    I guess I’m in a minority of one, but I voted “yes”, that you should mediate. I’m not convinced that the Bellagio should have offered Ms. Buckner anything, but since they did, it should at least be something she can use.

  • Jennifer Hanuschak

    If it were a case of why her skin reacted, I would not mediate this one. There is no way to prove the Bellagio was responsible at all. However, I might mediate this one, simply because the offer was for something that the customer already had. Hotels need better customer service strategies than to offer a guest what she was already going to get.

  • http://writingtravel.com Lanora

    I also voted no. A traveler who is so concerned about her appearance should think twice before using an unfamiliar soap (and an abrasive washcloth) on facial skin. That’s why I travel with products I know and trust.

    Gentle face cleansing wipes don’t count as liquids, creams, or gels, so there’s no excuse.

  • L2Y2

    I voted “no” because there is no proof that Laura was affected by the soap. It could have been an allergic reaction to something she touched anywhere, or something she ate. If she did break out from the soap, she probably already knows she has sensitive skin and should not be using whatever products a hotel leaves for its guests. I know I have sensitive skin and NEVER use products in a hotel room. I always bring my own products when traveling. I also agree with the person who mentioned going to a pharmacy and asking for some help from the pharmacist. OTC Benedryl or cortizone may have gotten rid of the rash quickly and it could have been less of a problem.

  • Vanessa

    I voted no. Personally I have sensitive skin, and a harsh soap will make my face break out – and I don’t get pimples either. I don’t use hotel soap unless it’s absolutely necessary- but definitely not on my face… If this was a serious case I would think they’d visit a doctor. Her break out looks like harsh chemicals, or an allergic reaction (maybe both?). Next time she visits a hotel maybe she’ll remember to bring her toiletries.. As for the compensation – well if this trip was free they can’t really give her money back so the offer comp was very generous.

  • Jeanne in TX

    I also voted no. Don’t mean to sound unfeeling, but it seems odd that you’d wash your face with the standard hotel bar soap.

    Maybe I’m unusual, but when I go on a trip, I always bring a small bottle of my favorite brand of face wash and face moisturizer, just so there are no unpleasant surprises. I even bring my favorite shampoo and conditioner, because my skin and my hair are extremely dry. Standard “hotel brand” bar soaps and shampoos tend to make my skin and hair even more dry than usual, so I don’t risk using them.

    Maybe a lesson learned for the next time she travels:

    Always bring your own soaps, shampoos and moisterizers and don’t use the hotel standard issue. That way, you won’t have to worry so much about an allergic reaction. Pack them in your suit case and cross your fingers and hope the airline doesn’t lose your bags. ;-)

    As for compensation – the compensation they offered seems more than adequate to me.

  • John

    Boy she sounds really ungreatful …
    1. If she has enough “play” to warrant the free nights and buffets, she would be dealing with a host not the front desk.
    2. Free stays are free stays. Free food is free food. So she makes an extra trip or extends one. Have fun! Its Vegas.

    Fact is … there’s no real proof that the hotel did anything wrong. Her story is that she checked in and ended up with a rash. Rashes come from lots of sources most of which the hotel has no control over. She then appears to have over reacted to the rash by refusing to do anything. The hotel then grants her another stay with 2 comp’ed meals.

    I think the hotel went well above what they should have. Bravo to the Bellagio!

  • Raven

    Voted no. She showed no personal responsibility by either going to a pharmacy or doctor and it’s possible that something else caused the rash. She has an offer. She just needs to accept it.

  • Eric

    I voted no because there is no proof the soap or washcloth caused here break-out. If she knew she had sensitive skin, and was prone to breakout, she should have brought trusted cosmetics from home.

  • http://www.cutcat.com ChelseaGirl

    I totally agree with everyone. Even if she reacted to the soap, or to the detergent that they use to wash the sheets, people get allergic reactions and that is not the hotel’s responsibility. It’s one thing if you get food poisoning from the restaurant, or bites from bedbugs. But allergic reactions don’t fall into the same category, and the hotel was generous enough in its offer. The customer doesn’t indicate what she wants; no doubt a partcal refund. Sorry, stuff happens. Deal with it.

  • LeeAnne

    How fun to see such consensus among all of Christopher’s disparate readers!

    I think pretty much everything has been said. Minor rash that could have been caused by anything…no proof it’s the hotel’s fault…no visit to the doc…childish reaction by the OP who CHOSE not enjoy her vacation…generous (and IMO unnecessary) offer of compensation by the hotel (hey, if she doesn’t want it, *I’ll* take her free nights there!). All in all this adds up to…nothing more than a whiny customer who wants to use a personal health issue (sensitive skin) to squeeze something of value out of a business.

    If she woke up with a headcold, would she be blaming the hotel for harboring viruses in the room?

    This case stinks. Christopher has way better things to do then help this greedy traveler.

  • Robbie

    I voted no. This looks just like a rash my daughter got while on a cruise. Turned out to be something in the sunscreen. Did I expect anything from the cruise line? No. It did not ruin our vacation. Just a minor inconvenience. Happens everyday in one form or another.

  • Plat flyer

    No

    The hotel already made an offer, ’nuff said.

  • Randy

    I said yes, but only because I believe the property company would want to know and have a chance to do something. I do not believe they owe anything, but they deserve to be made aware. And yes, a duplicate offer is less than sincere. They don’t have to offer a lot, but if they want to make a sincere offer it should not be what they give anyone anyway.

  • Steve H

    I’d vote no, and add that IF the soap was the cause, she should take it up with the manufacturer, not the hotel.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    I voted No. I agree with the comments posted by the ‘No’ commenters.

  • Mike Z

    One more comment but given the photo, it looks like the breakout is confined to the cheeks for the most part and doesn’t extend all the way up on her forehead. Just going off the photo, if it was really the soap that caused a bad rash, her entire face would be broken out. (and possibly the rest of her body since most people use the hotel soap in the shower as well) What it looks like to me is that she either didn’t wash the soap completely off, or most likely, it os from some new cosmetics. I know in vegas there are a TON of stores that one can go to and get their face done or try on some new makeup.

  • Al

    Voted no. Even if we assume the rash was caused by the soap/towel, I don’t see how it’s the hotel’s fault. Some people are just allergic to things. End of story.

  • Bill

    I guess I missed the boat, but I would’ve voted no. She should carry her own bar of soap if she has issues. I fail to see what the hotel did wrong here.

    Things happen all the time. I don’t see why hotels have to pay through the nose each time something does. None of you even now what happened to me in a hotel last week because I didn’t complain here. I resolved it with the hotel and it was about them preventing the problem from happening again, not about me getting free stuff.

  • Brian C

    I would vote NO to moderating this case. It seems to be another example of a trumped up excuse to get a room/show refund (I would guess that’s what Ms Buckner wants). I see an unfortunate incident that, while uncomfortable and perhaps slightly embarassing, isn’t significant enough that it should have ruined her entire stay and caused her to miss a show.

    From Ms Buckner’s accounts I didn’t hear any real reason why she couldn’t use the pool or go to the show. Instead, I hear an unfortunate alergic reaction occurred on her trip and because of that she wants the hotel to foot the bill.

    That’s not right!

  • Jennifer

    I missed the poll but I, too, would have voted “no.” First, there is no way to know what caused this rash. I sometimes get a rash after wearing freshly laundered clothes and most times not, even from the same laundry detergent. There can be something else going on with the body chemistry that can cause an allergic reaction then just the new soap. As explained by my doc, it can be a weakened immune system from stress or fatigue such as from traveling, not sleeping well in new surroundings, too much to drink causing some dehydration. Secondly, even if the soap caused an allergic reaction to this individual doesn’t mean that the soap is defective. Again, unless there’s a rash of people complaining about this particular product (pun intended), then it’s not just the soap, it’s the soap plus something else going on with the human body.

    I have to wonder if this is the first time this individual has broken out. Not likely and if so, she has sensitive skin and needs to use her own products that she knows won’t cause a reaction.

  • LeeAnne

    FYI, I showed this photo to a dermatologist that I know socially. He said it looks like a pretty standard (and mild) contact dermatitis. (Note that this is not a medical diagnosis – just the informal comments of someone who knows more than most of us about this type of rash.) He says it could have been caused by anything that she came in contact with on that part of her body – she could have gotten a cheek-kiss from friend wearing a moisturizer, or even passed through a cloud of perfume sprayed by a saleslady at the mall. Or she might have touched something – a surface that had been cleaned with a strong cleaning product, for example – and then touched her face.

    Those of you questioning why it’s only on one spot of her body are right to question it: if it was a cosmetic product (soap or whatever) that she used all over, it probably would have shown up in more than just that one small patch.

    And to make things even more interesting (and her case even LESS compelling), the fact is that in order for her to have broken out in that rash, she probably had to have encountered that substance before, and been symptom free! According to him, the initial exposure does not cause a rash. However, it sensitizes your skin so that you will react to the next exposure. If you react the first time you are exposed to an agent, you probably were exposed before without knowing.

    So who should she be going after to squeeze funds as payback for her own minor health issue? The hotel that (she thinks) exposed her the second time? Or the unknown entity that exposed her the first time?

    The answer, of course, is: neither. She’s just trying to extort money out of the Bellagio for something they have nothing to do with.

  • Michelle Cox

    I vote no way. I also think you should call Bellagio and tell them their offering for “free” nights are above and beyond and to give them to someone else.

    Careful people…if you know this lady she will probably “accidentally” fall on your doorstep and sue you for your house.

    Absolutely ridiculous.

  • Eric

    @ iamltr: Zyrtec my friend. It’s changed my life.

  • K

    What I find interesting is that the rash showed up AFTER her 2nd night, leading me to believe she used their product and slept on their sheets for 2 nights before she had a reaction.

  • Linda Monk

    I have very sensitive skin, and over the years when trying new “hypo allergenic” products I have had reactions. Sometimes my whole face was affected, other times just a patch…once I went a whole summer with what looked like a burnt letter q on my face because the reaction was so severe.
    Did I stomp my feet and demand compensation? No, I got on with my life because I know this is my problem, and that the majority of people would have been fine using the product. Chalk it up to experience, make a note of what may have caused it, and avoid it in the future….or better yet don’t take the gamble on holidays, bring your own products.

  • Nobody

    Jeeeesh! So many comments! I was in Vegas all last week when the temps were a degree short of all-time records, all over 100 every day.

    Whatever happened to the mantra, “Whatever happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas”?
    Next time, stay away from the shrimp at the buffet, especially avoid the all you can eat “$39.95 Seafood Buffet” at the RIO.

    Here lies the tourist at the pool
    Got wasted at the Disco last night
    Fell asleep when he was still quite white
    In the curve of the Vegas tower
    Simulating a microwave at full power

    RIP
    Nobody Was Faster

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-1316444/Las-Vegas-death-ray-hotel-leaves-guests-badly-burnt.html