Bitten by a surprise $250 pet fee in my hotel room

It’s been a while since we looked at the pets-in-hotel-rooms controversy. But today I have a cautionary tale about taking your dog on vacation.

Jennifer Sapasap booked a room through Hotwire in Arlington, Texas, recently. Since Hotwire doesn’t reveal the name of your hotel until after you buy it, she didn’t know she’d end up at the Quality Inn. Nor was there any way of telling the property via her electronic reservation that she was bringing her dog. (Hotwire has a helpful section on flying with pets, but no such information about hotels.)

So Sapasap says she phoned the hotel after finishing the booking and asked about her animal companion.

I was told yes, [they allowed dogs]. When checking in I was told there was a $50 pet deposit. No problem.

Our room was a dump, but we were basically only there to sleep for one night so we didn’t complain. I was told since we had already paid for the room I just need to leave the keys in the room to checkout.

But after checking my card online I saw a $250 charge from the hotel. I called and spoke with Keith, the general manager. He was extremely rude and told me while there was no damage reported, the room I was in was not a “pet” room therefore the $250 was for a deep cleaning since they didn’t know about my dog.

I said obviously I told you about my dog or I wouldn’t have a $50 pet deposit! Basically we got nowhere and everyone I talk to “cannot help” Is there anybody who can help me?

I suggested Jennifer put her complaint in writing and send it directly to Quality Inn, which she did. It routed the grievance to the property, which answered her:

After talking with front office manager Matt He stated he was never notified of a Pet at check in as all pet rooms are located on first floor If this had been the case then your room would be located on first floor for ease of taking pet to outside.

Upon check in you signed and agreed to $250.00 pet fee if pet is found in non pet room

Keith
General Manager

Interesting response, on a number of levels.

I thought I’d try. Here’s what Keith wrote back to me:

In regards to the question posed, we are indeed a pet friendly hotel. Due to special needs of our guests and as a courtesy to those with pets, all of our pet-designated rooms are on the ground floor. The registration cards signed by guests upon check-in read as follows:

“Pets are welcome in some rooms at a fee of $50.00 per stay. There is no fee for recognized ADA service animals. If the hotel is not notified of a pet a cleaning fee of $250.00 will be applied.”

Please note that the $50.00 is a fee and not a refundable deposit as the room must still be more thoroughly cleaned than a room not occupied by a pet.

Mrs. Sapasap has already contacted both the hotel and our Guest Relations on this matter and did, in fact, sign this agreement, which can be provided if necessary, without notifying our front desk team of pet occupancy.

Please feel free to contact me with any further questions.

That sounds better — but still, Sapasap is looking at an extra $250. I’m willing to bet that’s more than she paid for a night at the Quality Inn through Hotwire.

What’s the lesson to be learned here? Is it not to bring a pet if you’re booking through an “opaque” site? To avoid the Quality Inn? To get everything in writing when you check in, to avoid a “pet cleaning” surprise?

All of the above, perhaps. As I review Sapasap’s case, I see someone who says she tried to do the right thing — if her account is to be believed, she was more than up-front with the hotel about her dog and was willing to pay extra for the room. The Quality Inn’s attitude, at least initially, seemed to leave something to be desired.

Opaque sites are not really set up to handle travelers with special needs, like large families who require two queen beds and a pullout, or people with pets who might have to pay an extra fee. I’d definitely consider booking elsewhere if you’re traveling with Fido.

Sapasap’s next option — probably her last option — would be to dispute the $250 charge on her credit card.

(Photo: J narin/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • Blackadar

    This is what charge-backs are for. If you put down $50 for a pet deposit (as you indicate that you did), then it’s their responsibility to provide you a pet room.

  • AspenDew

    If she’s got a $50 pet deposit on her receipt, she obviously notified them about her dog upon check-in. It is not the guest’s responsibility to know which rooms are “pet” and “non-pet” rooms.

  • SirWired

    This is yet another object lesson as to why you should read everything before you sign, because it leads to situations like this.

    On the one hand, she paid a $50 pet fee, indicating that the hotel most certainly did know she had a pet. On the other, she signed a document stating that if she had a pet, they would charge a $250 fine.

    Since the two are in conflict, I would tend to rule in the consumer’s favor…

    SirWired

  • Raven

    She should contact the corporation that manages all of the Quality Inns nationwide. This is abysmal customer care and it needs to be directed to the highest level possible since the manager is obviously an incompetent, rude, hack.

  • EvilEmpryss

    I travel with a service dog and I book through online sites for my hotels. The best advice I can give for people traveling with pets is to make absolutely certain that the people at the desk know you’ve got a pet and have something in writing that they know it and that you are clear on what they’ll charge you for the privilege of having your companion with you. When I check in to the hotel I leave the kids in the car with my husband and take the dog in with me. That way there is no question that they knew I had a dog staying with me.

  • Carver

    @Chris

    While I agree with you that opaque sites are probably not best for special needs, this article does not provide a basis for that conclusion. The problem here is that Quality Inn and the OP have a dispute as to whether she informed them that she had a pet. The Opaque site really isn’t the issue. The same problem could have arisen had she booked with the Quality Inn directly.

    This shoud be a relatively straightforward case so I wonder if we are missing something. If she indeed paid a $50 pet deposit/fee/whatever, how exactly is the hotel able to credibly claim that it was not informed of the pet. That is the question that Keith needs to answer, and is not addressed in the story.

    @SirWired

    Actually, she signed a contract stating she agreed to a charge if a pet was found in a non-pet room. That’s a big difference. If she paid a pet fee and can prove it, then there is no dispute. Whatever room she was given becomes, by definition, a pet room, as it was given to her with the full knowledge of the hotel.

  • Carver

    @Jennifer and Chris

    I’m curious. Does your folio show the $50 pet charge as a seperate line item, or is it just incorporated into one large bill?

  • Monica

    She should get the $250 returned. If she has a receipt showing she paid the $50 deposit, the hotel really can’t deny that they knew. It was then the hotel’s responsibility to put her in a pet room. If she did sign something indicating a $250 fee, then shame on her for not reading the document. Like Sir Wired said, the two charges are in conflict and the company should kick it in favor of the customer.

  • Roberto

    Of course the hotel knew about the pet. Why else would Sapasap have even signed some “pet contract”?

    I have never been asked to sign a pet fee contract just to rent a hotel room. If Quality Inn didn’t know about the pet, why the heck did they make Sapasap sign their pet contract?

  • MeanMeosh

    After re-reading this article, I question whether the $50 fee was actually charged or not. Note the traveler’s response closely: “I was told since we had already paid for the room I just need to leave the keys in the room to checkout.” Hotwire obviously wouldn’t have collected the $50 pet fee when she booked the room. Unless the traveler paid the $50 separately before checking in (which we don’t know), it couldn’t have been charged on the original reservation. If that’s the case, we have a failure to communicate somewhere. Either the clerk forgot about the $50 when claiming “the room was paid” and forgot to enter it into the system, or the traveler thought she was notifying the property when she called to confirm their pet policy, but the person she talked to didn’t write it down. Bottom line, I’d really like to know what happened to that $50.

    However, the use of opaque sites for travelers with special needs does still pose a problem. The traveler got lucky in this case, because she called the hotel and discovered that yes, they do accept pets. But what would have happened if she’d called and they said no? We’d probably be reading about a refund dispute with Hotwire instead. And yes, Carver, you’re right that this could have happened even when booking with the hotel directly if the right questions aren’t asked, and the terms and conditions read correctly.

  • Jesse

    Chris,

    Unless you say otherwise I believe we all are under the assumption that she paid a $50.00 (Deposit) Fee for a pet. If that is the case, she notified the property about this instance.

    In this case, she should not be required to pay $250 and that should be returned.

    Are we wrong to assume that?

  • http://www.everywhereist.com Everywhereist

    Given the negative PR Quality Inns has already received (I certainly would not stay with them, whether I had a dog or not) you’d think they would wisen up, refund her money, and apologize.

    I agree with Monica and the other commentors that you cannot charge someone a $50 deposit for having a dog, and then claim that they weren’t informed. It’s illogical, and unfair to the customer.

  • Grant Ritchie

    Where is Quality Inn corporate in all this? It sounds as if General Manager Keith gots his rules and he’s, by God, stickin’ to ‘em. Are we really supposed to believe that his room cleaners, even if they were paid $25 an hour, spent 10 hours cleaning that room? Come on, Keith… that doesn’t pass the straight face test. So what do we have here? GM Keith sticks Ms. Sapasap for $250, but costs Quality Inn thousands in negative publicity. Come ON corporate… if you don’t step in here, when DO you step in?

  • Jennifer (not the letter writer)

    “Keith” seems a bit of a dim bulb. He says that if the front desk had been advised of the pet, she would have been given a first floor room. However, Jennifer did notify the hotel of her pet or she would not have been required to pay a $50 pet fee, a fee that Keith seems to acknowledge Jennifer paid. It appears the front desk clerk, Mr. He either did not know the hotel’s policy of placing pets in first floor rooms and has now tried to pass off his mistake to Jennifer or that he wanted to slip a $250 charge through.

    If I were Jennifer, I would definitely request a chargeback with all documentation and notify the corporate office. If she still doesn’t get her money back, I would post accurate reviews on Tripadvisor, Hotwire, wherever, and all of the pet friendly websites like dogfriendly.com, petswelcome.com, etc. Finally, I would not use an opaque site if I were traveling with my dog. However, it appears that Jennifer decided to do so only after verifying with the Quality Inn that they accept pets. I cannot find fault with Jennifer on this issue at all. Even if she read and understood the $250.00 fee she would not have understood it to apply to her as she notified the clerk she had a pet and was charged the $50 fee. It is totally on “Keith” and the front desk clerk who checked her in for failing to put her in a pet friendly room. This seems more like a shakedown.

  • Sean

    At a minimum, the OP should get the $50 back for the pet deposit. How can you take a deposit then turn around and charge an additional cleaning fee of $250. The $250 is for those that stayed in the non-pet room and never paid a deposit. So in this case, the hotel has $300 payment on a $250 charge.
    Something is screwy here, Carver’s question hit the nail on the head, does it show a separate line item, if so, it’s all on the hotel, they assigned the room, they’re responsible, how does an OP know which is a dog room, unless the hotel put a little “no pet” sign on the door of the room.
    Oh, and I’m sure that travel insurance would have prevented this issue :p

  • Roger

    So, the hotel handed her a card to sign that explained the fee’s involved, and she presumably returned that card to the desk clerk, with her signature, since they say they can provide it as proof.

    So when the desk clerk received this card back, signed, wouldn’t that be considered informing the hotel that you’re bringing a pet into your room?

    I’d say force them to show you the signed card, as they say they can do. When they produce it, point to it as evidence that they were, in fact, informed of the pet.

    Roger

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Carver – “The Opaque site really isn’t the issue.”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -
    Did the Hotwire website asked Ms. Sapasap if she is a smoker? if she will be driving a car? If she will be traveling with a pet? If Hotwire did then their website isn’t the issue. I went to Hotwire website and they don’t ask these questions.

    If you are a smoker, it will make sense to have only hotels that offer smoking rooms. Some smokers could be unhappy if they ended up at a smoke-free hotel like the Marriott chain.

    There are hotels that charge a deposit and/or fees for pets as well as some hotels do not accept pets (except for service dog). It does make sense for Hotwire as well as other opaque sites to ask if a you are traveling with a pet.

    There are hotels that charge for parking. Again, it makes sense for Hotwire as well as other opque sites to ask if you will be driving a car so that it can disclose the parking fees.

    @ Carver – “The same problem could have arisen had she booked with the Quality Inn directly”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -
    You are probably right. I went to the Choice website and it doesn’t ask if you are traveling with a pet nor does it disclose the fees and/or deposit for a hotel. Again, their website should ask about pets, etc.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    Was Ms. Sapasap charged $ 50 for her dog? Based upon the article, it seems to me that she wasn’t charged the $ 50 on her credit card. I would have used the logic of “you charge me $ 50 for my pet but you put me in a non-pet room and now you expect me to pay $ 250…I don’t think so” with the hotel.

    Since she didn’t check out in the morning at the front desk and it is a good possibility that a different person was working the front desk (if she walk by the front desk in the morning with her dog when leaving) making it difficult for a front desk person to know her name, how could the hotel knew that she had a dog in the room? Her dog had an accident in the room? Dog hair in the room? A guess in another room reported a barking dog to the front desk? Dog smell in the room?

    If she was charged the $ 50 nightly pet rate then she shouldn’t be charged the $ 250…it was the fault of the person working on the front desk.

    If she wasn’t charged the $ 50 nightly pet rate, it is my guess that she asked what is the fee\charge for a pet and the front desk person told her the fee\charge…she probably didn’t specially told the front desk person that she has a dog and the front person probably didn’t ask “do you have a dog or cat with you?”

    “I was told since we had already paid for the room I just need to leave the keys in the room to checkout.” Was there a statement\bill under her door in the morning? Did she received a receipt for the $ 50 upon check-in? Even if they swiped her card for the $ 50, at most hotels they will put a statement\bill for the $ 50 under the door in the morning.

    If she didn’t receive a statement\bill under her door in the morning, I think it make sense to check out at the front desk in the morning even if the room is pre-paid and there were no additional charges. Billing mistakes can happen and it is better to deal with the problem in person than phone\e-mail.

  • Mike

    I think there are a few unanswered questions here with the first and main one being, “was she ever charged the $50 deposit?” That said, she may not have been charged, but a hold may have been placed on the card for that amount of money. the credit card company can answer for sure.

    In regards to a seperate document disclosing pet fees, I have seen pet fees before, but they were all written in with the standard room document you get at sign in. She would not have had to sign a seperate form.

    My “guess” as to what happened is… She did disclose the fact that a pet would be in the room and that the person working the front desk failed to remember that only first floor rooms are for pets. The front desk person then went off shift (or maybe even quit before this dispute) and the people coming in after think someone smuggled in a pet. They needed to clean and of course popped the $250 charge on Jennifer because of the pet.

    OR

    Jennifer never knew of the $50 deposit or gave one up and she lied to Chris in order to try and get money back.

    Its also my guess that even if a pet stayed in the room, there would be no carpet cleaning, washing of all bedding materials and draperies or anything else. At most they would probably vacuum a bit better. if indeed the hotels went to the length of “deep cleaning” then i would love to stay in this room afterwards as it would be the cleanest room on the property.

  • Ed Kummel

    The customer *SHOULD* get her $250 back. Why?
    Well, she signed the card stating that there is a $50 deposit and a $250 fee if a pet stays in a non-pet room…
    So she paid her deposit and was given a room to stay in. How is she to know what is a pet designated room as stated in this statement:
    “Pets are welcome in some rooms at a fee of $50.00 per stay.”
    Unless the rooms are clearly marked “Pet Specific room” the customer has no idea. Since she was given a room to stay in, she can assume that the room is a that allows pets. This is clearly a mistake of the Hotel’s and not the customer.
    Check off Quality Inns from the list of hotels/motels I will not be staying at!

  • Keith

    I have to ask, if she did not notify the hotel of the dog then how did they know there was one in the room? With no damage to the room I find it hard to believe that someone would be able to tell if a dog was in there or not.

    Keith

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Grant Ritchie – “Are we really supposed to believe that his room cleaners, even if they were paid $25 an hour, spent 10 hours cleaning that room?”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – -
    It doesn’t cost $ 250 to clean a room where a hotel guest smoked, had a pet in the room or etc. The objective for the $ 250 cleaning fee is to make it ‘prohibitive’ so that guests who want to smoke in a smoke-free room or guest who wants to sneak in pets will think twice before breaking the hotel’s rules. For example, if the cleaning fee for smoking in a smoke-free room was only $ 25 or $ 50, there will be guests that will be willing to pay $ 25 in a heartbeat to smoke in their room instead of walking outside to the parking lot to smoke especially at night.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Ed Kummel – “Well, she signed the card stating that there is a $50 deposit and a $250 fee if a pet stays in a non-pet room.”
    - – - – - – - –
    That is their standard disclosure on their registration paperwork. When I check into a hotel, it is very common for me to sign or initial the room rate, the non-smoking policy, the pet policy (if there is one), parking policy (if there is one), etc. on the registration paperwork.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Mike – “Its also my guess that even if a pet stayed in the room, there would be no carpet cleaning, washing of all bedding materials and draperies or anything else. At most they would probably vacuum a bit better. if indeed the hotels went to the length of “deep cleaning” then i would love to stay in this room afterwards as it would be the cleanest room on the property.”
    - – - – - – - – - – -
    I don’t think that they do ‘deep cleaning’. I stayed a Choice brand hotel in British Columbia. This Choice hotel property accepted pets on the first floor. The hotel was full and I was given a room on the first floor. The room was very clean but the room had the smell of ‘wet dog’.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Keith – “I have to ask, if she did not notify the hotel of the dog then how did they know there was one in the room? With no damage to the room I find it hard to believe that someone would be able to tell if a dog was in there or not.”
    - – - – - -
    That was one of my points if she did not notify the hotel. I like to say that there are three sides to the story…in this case, Ms. Sapasap version; the hotel version and the truth.

    I think there are a few unanswered questions and details about this situation.

    For example, where is this Quality Inn located? I went to the Choice website and there are two Quality Inns in Arlington, TX (Quality Inn & Suites – 1607 N. Watson Rd., Arlington, TX 76006 and Quality Inn at Arlington Highlands 121 East I-20, Arlington, TX 76018) and neither one accept pets. There is a chance that the corporate website could be wrong. I did find a Quality Inn in Euless, TX (1001 West Airport Freeway, Euless, TX 76040…8 miles from Arlington, TX). Lets not bad moutch the Quality Inns in Arlington if the Quality Inn is in Euless, TX.

    Did she paid the $ 50.00 nightly room rate for her dog?

    As I stated previously, if she paid the $ 50.00 nightly room rate for her dog, she shouldn’t have been charged $ 250.

  • Kelly

    Chris,
    Can you find out if she did indeed get charged this $50 fee? That fact seems to be left out of the story. The answer to that would clear up a lot of confusion. Please update us.

    Thanks!

  • Steve

    This is yet another instance of a hotel claiming to be “pet friendly” when in actuality it is merely “pet tolerant”. This traveler should do two things: (1) get her $250 back and (2) never book on an opaque site when traveling with a pet. This article underscores the need for more lodging establishments to cater to the ever-growing segment of travelers who refuse to leave home without their trusty canine companions.

  • Kevin M

    @Arizona: You said
    “I don’t think that they do ‘deep cleaning’. I stayed a Choice brand hotel in British Columbia. This Choice hotel property accepted pets on the first floor. The hotel was full and I was given a room on the first floor. The room was very clean but the room had the smell of ‘wet dog’.”

    Actually, that’s the point of the pet rooms – they charge $50 as a “normal” pet fee because they may have to do a little extra cleaning in the rooms, but not to the extent of removing all pet dander, etc., because you expect that there will be residue of that sort in a pet room – just like there’s always smoking residue in a smoking room.

    But when you’re in a non-pet room (or a non-smoking room), people expect a much higher standard – no residue, period. That means steam-cleaning the carpets, removing the drapes and dry-cleaning or steam-cleaning them, removing all bedding for a thorough washing, perhaps even rotating out the mattresses. Any upholstered furniture must also be steam-cleaned. And in a non-smoking room, even that much may not be enough, as cigarette smoke tends to embed itself right into the paint or wallpaper.

    This isn’t to say that every hotel actually does this when there’s a pet in a non-pet room, or smoking in a non-smoking room, but that’s really what’s required to bring the room back to “standard”. My guess is that it’s more likely a hotel would do this in the pet situation, on the grounds that pet allergies are more likely to be severe and/or life-threatening, and they don’t want to be sued.

  • Carver

    Slightly off-topic.

    A $250 cleaning fee is not unreasonable if they do what the “W” brand of hotel does (Or claims to do). The carpet is shampooed, the drapes dry cleaned, and most importantly, the room is taken out of service for a day or two while this is happening. So the cost is a lot more than the $25 per hour labor charge.

  • Carver

    @Arizona

    What I meant about the opaque sites is that Chris concluded from this affair that opaque sites should not be used for special bookings. While that is probably a true statement, this unfortunate circumstance has nothing to do with how the OP booked the hotel. Whatever error happened, happened at the check-in time at the front desk. Either she informed the hotel of her pet or she didn’t. In this case, neither circumstance is related to the booking method.

    In legalese, its a failure of proof.

  • Bill

    Something is fishy here. If she paid the fee, they would know she let them know and wouldn’t charge the $250 pet fee.

    If I were travelling with a pet, I would make sure that pet fee was on there to cover my butt, which would make it pretty hard for them to charge $250 later.

    It is difficult to understand how such a straightforward issue is a problem, I think we are missing some information here.

  • Joe Farrell

    Even better – what extra services did the room get? I would go to small claims and ask them to produce the log of the person who cleaned the room she stayed in.

    Then, see if they did anything differently because there was a dog present. Assuming no little doggie puddles and everything ended up clean when she left, if all they do is charge $250 [which is MUCH more likely, I mean, c'mon, its a Quality Inn, do they have a deep carpet cleaner and all the sanitizing agents?] then it becomes fraud if it is for a service they don’t do . . . .

    I bet THAT line of inquiry gets the refund alot faster . . . and then after she gets the refund, send a complaint to the State Consumer protection agency or attorney general so they know about the consumer fraud going on . .. these are FAVORITE targets for consumer protection people because its so easy to prove . . . .

  • riroon

    What I am curious about:

    The contract states ‘if a pet stays in a non-pet room…’, but on the contract, does it specifically state that all pet-friendly rooms are located on the first floor? If it does not, how does the OP know that her room was NOT a pet-friendly room?

    If the contract was not specific as to the location of the pet-friendly rooms, and they did accept her pet deposit, I see a whole lot of *fail* on the hotel’s part (read: lawsuit and bad press on the internets)

    I’d love to see the actual contract and the actual receipt.

  • Penelope

    I am a General Manager of a Choice Hotel (not Quality Inn, but same chain) and looking at this she should not have been charged. Our hotel does not allow pets but we still have guests sign off on smoking and pet policy. You will be surprised how many people sneak in dogs without telling the desk at check in. She obviously did (calling) so a note should have been made and at that point she should have been assigned a pet friendly room. I only charge $150 if we find that a dog left damage in the room, because we allow Service Dogs. I am in the middle of a case where a guest had a service dog and left a mess in the room (feces all over) and barked all morning. He was clearly not being looked after. I charged $150 because it did take us 2 hours to clean the carpet, wash all the bedding and still the rooms smells bad. He is wanting proof of the damage….All I have is reports from housekeepers what was done to the room to clean it etc. No pictures unfortunately and then still how can I win this case? He’ll probably just tell me I fabricated the reports and/or pictures. I rather have a guest come to me letting me know the dog had an accident in the room than finding out after check out and I charge you for it. Please do not be sneaky. Regardless if it is a service dog or not, any damage (even done by a guest) should be paid for by the guest. I will probably replace the padding and carpet, which is at my expense so why would I make this up?? To come back to Sapasap, she should nto be charged, they clearly put her in the wrong room.

  • Kate

    I am in the midst of a dispute over a $250 charge I was assessed several days after checking out of my hotel room in Milwaukee at the the Hyatt Regency. When I called to ask what the charge was for, I was told that it was a fine for smoking in the room. Because I absolutely did not smoke in the room, I told them so and asked them to remove the charge. They refused. I called the Hyatt’s corporate office and they, too, have refused to remove the bogus charge. I am livid. I will never stay at the Hyatt again and am disputing the charge with my credit card company. And if that does not work, I will be forced to file a complaint in circuit court.

  • http://www.clarkecomputer.com Charles Clarke

    No update yet on whether or not she paid the $50 pet fee? That seems crucial to whether she or the hotel is at fault.

    @Penelope – Why don’t you have pictures? I’m used to the apartment rental business and we take pictures of damages. I would expect that the first thing your housekeepers should do when they see a room with feces is to either take pictures or call the front desk to send up someone to take pictures. Take a picture of the room # with the door open right before you take the rest of the pictures. End with a copy of the tenant’s bill (before or after the added charge – mainly to identify who was staying in the room). If these, or better, practices aren’t part of Choice’s manual, then you’ve been shortchanged there also.